Theophylline versus terbutaline in treating critically ill children with status asthmaticus: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2005-02-26 · Randomised trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of theophylline, terbutaline, or theophylline combined with terbutaline treatment in critically ill children with status asthmaticus who are already receiving continuous nebulized albuterol and intravenous corticosteroids. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blind trial. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary-care children's medical center. PATIENTS: Forty critically ill children between the ages of 3 and 15 yrs with impending respiratory failure secondary to status asthmaticus. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received intravenous methylprednisolone and continuous nebulized albuterol. The three study groups received theophylline plus placebo (group 1), terbutaline plus placebo (group 2), or theophylline and terbutaline together (group 3). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Differences in baseline characteristics, change in clinical asthma score over time, length of pediatric intensive care unit stay, and incidence of adverse events were determined. The three study groups were similar in age, gender, race, asthma severity, and treatment. There were no differences in clinical asthma score over time, length of pediatric intensive care unit stay, or incidence of adverse events between the three groups, with the exception of a higher incidence of nausea in children in group 3. The median hospital cost of medication and theophylline blood levels was significantly lower in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 (280 US dollars vs. 3,908 US dollars vs. 4,045 US dollars, respectively, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Theophylline, when added to continuous nebulized albuterol therapy and intravenous corticosteroids, is as effective as terbutaline in treating critically ill children with status asthmaticus. The addition of theophylline to baseline therapy is more cost-effective when compared with terbutaline alone or terbutaline and theophylline together. Theophylline should be considered for use early in the management of critically ill asthmatic children.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Children · Corticosteroids · Respiratory drugs · Terbutaline
Related articles
- Comparison of the effects of nebulized terbutaline with or without intravenous betamethasone on exhaled nitric oxide in children with acute asthma attack. (J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 2006)
- The effectiveness of high-dose inhaled budesonide therapy in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations in children. (Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2001)
- Randomised controlled trial of intravenous magnesium sulfate versus terbutaline for children in the management of acute exacerbation of asthma. (J Pak Med Assoc, 2026)
- Comparison of intravenous terbutaline versus normal saline in pediatric patients on continuous high-dose nebulized albuterol for status asthmaticus. (Pediatr Emerg Care, 2007)
- Treating Respiratory Emergencies in Children Study (T-RECS): a pilot trial of prehospital treatment for life-threatening pediatric asthma. (J Asthma, 2026)
- Intravenous Bronchodilators in Pediatric Critical Asthma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. (Pediatr Pulmonol, 2025)