[The effect of NaCl solution with different concentration on the resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock].
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · 2010-01-19 · Randomised trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical results of different concentration NaCl solution in hemorrhagic shock resuscitation. METHODS: The 75 cases with hemorrhagic shock were divided into five groups by means of random number table. Treat the cases with 0.9% (control group), 3%, 4.5%, 6% and 7.5% NaCl solution, respectively. Observe the changes of BP, HR, blood gas, renal function, electrolyte concentration of plasma, before and after treatment. RESULTS: After transfusion, compared with groups of 0.9% NS, the mean BP of patients in other four groups rise more quickly but only the group of 4.5% can last 30 minutes (P < 0.05), and K(+) of plasma in groups of 6%, 7.5% NS decline more obviously (P < 0.05), the group of 4.5% maintain the best lever. CONCLUSION: The mean BP of patients rise quickly and continue for a long time, in the group of 4.5%. Meanwhile the internal environment of the body maintain relatively stable in the group of 4.5%.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Crystalloids · Fluids & blood · Hypertonic saline
Related articles
- Efficacy and safety of hypertonic saline solutions fluid resuscitation on hypovolemic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (Cardiol J, 2022)
- Resuscitation of traumatic hemorrhagic shock patients with hypertonic saline-without dextran-inhibits neutrophil and endothelial cell activation. (Shock, 2012)
- Hypertonic saline 5% vs. lactated ringer for resuscitating patients in hemorrhagic shock. (Middle East J Anaesthesiol, 2008)
- Volume replacement in the resuscitation of trauma patients with acute hemorrhage: an umbrella review. (Int J Emerg Med, 2023)
- Administration of Hypertonic Solutions for Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials. (Anesth Analg, 2017)
- Prehospital hypertonic fluid resuscitation for trauma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2017)