A multisite assessment of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma field triage decision scheme for identifying seriously injured children and adults.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2011-11-24 · Observational study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACSCOT) has developed and updated field trauma triage protocols for decades, yet the ability to identify major trauma patients remains unclear. We estimate the diagnostic value of the Field Triage Decision Scheme for identifying major trauma patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥ 16) in a large and diverse multisite cohort. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of injured children and adults transported by 94 emergency medical services (EMS) agencies to 122 hospitals in 7 regions of the Western US from 2006 through 2008. Patients who met any of the field trauma triage criteria (per EMS personnel) were considered triage positive. Hospital outcomes measures were probabilistically linked to EMS records through trauma registries, state discharge data, and emergency department data. The primary outcome defining a "major trauma patient" was ISS ≥ 16. RESULTS: There were 122,345 injured patients evaluated and transported by EMS over the 3-year period, 34.5% of whom met at least 1 triage criterion and 5.8% had ISS ≥ 16. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the criteria for identifying major trauma patients were 85.8% (95% CI 85.0% to 86.6%) and 68.7% (95% CI 68.4% to 68.9%), respectively. Triage sensitivity and specificity, respectively, differed by age: 84.1% and 66.4% (0 to 17 years); 89.5% and 64.3% (18 to 54 years); and 79.9% and 75.4% (≥55 years). Evaluating the diagnostic value of triage by hospital destination (transport to Level I/II trauma centers) did not substantially improve these findings. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the Field Triage Decision Scheme for identifying major trauma patients is lower and specificity higher than previously described, particularly among elders.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Children · Older adults · Triage instruments
Related articles
- Diagnostic accuracy of prehospital triage tools for identifying major trauma in elderly injured patients: A systematic review. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2021)
- Developing a simple field triage scheme compatible with regional trauma situations and medical systems using machine learning: A nationwide trauma database study (Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2024)
- Validation of motor component of Glasgow coma scale in lieu of total Glasgow coma scale as a pediatric trauma field triage tool. (Am J Emerg Med, 2024)
- Geriatric trauma triage: optimizing systems for older adults-a publication of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Geriatric Trauma Committee. (Trauma Surg Acute Care Open, 2024)
- Modified physiologic criteria for the field triage scheme: Efficacy of major trauma recognition in different age groups in Asia. (Am J Emerg Med, 2024)
- Accuracy of the American College of Surgeons Minimum Criteria for Full Trauma Team Activation for Children. (Pediatr Emerg Care, 2024)