Exploration of the impact of a voice activated decision support system (VADSS) with video on resuscitation performance by lay rescuers during simulated cardiopulmonary arrest.
Emergency Medicine Journal · 2013-11-15 · Randomised trial
Abstract
AIM: To assess whether access to a voice activated decision support system (VADSS) containing video clips demonstrating resuscitation manoeuvres was associated with increased compliance with American Heart Association Basic Life Support (AHA BLS) guidelines. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomised controlled trial. Subjects with no recent clinical experience were randomised to the VADSS or control group and participated in a 5-min simulated out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest with another 'bystander'. Data on performance for predefined outcome measures based on the AHA BLS guidelines were abstracted from videos and the simulator log. RESULTS: 31 subjects were enrolled (VADSS 16 vs control 15), with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Study subjects in the VADSS were more likely to direct the bystander to: (1) perform compressions to ventilations at the correct ratio of 30:2 (VADSS 15/16 (94%) vs control 4/15 (27%), p=<0.001) and (2) insist the bystander switch compressor versus ventilator roles after 2 min (VADSS 12/16 (75%) vs control 2/15 (13%), p=0.001). The VADSS group took longer to initiate chest compressions than the control group: VADSS 159.5 (±53) s versus control 78.2 (±20) s, p<0.001. Mean no-flow fractions were very high in both groups: VADSS 72.2% (±0.1) versus control 75.4 (±8.0), p=0.35. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an audio and video assisted decision support system during a simulated out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest prompted lay rescuers to follow cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines but was also associated with an unacceptable delay to starting chest compressions. Future studies should explore: (1) if video is synergistic to audio prompts, (2) how mobile technologies may be leveraged to spread CPR decision support and (3) usability testing to avoid unintended consequences.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Bystanders · Decision support tools
Related articles
- Design and rationale of the TANGO2 trial: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of bystander compression-only CPR versus standard CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. (Am Heart J, 2026)
- How technology can save lives in cardiac arrest. (Curr Opin Crit Care, 2022)
- Mobile phone in the chain of survival. (Resuscitation, 2011)
- Can a voice assistant help bystanders save lives? A feasibility pilot study chatbot in beta version to assist OHCA bystanders. (Am J Emerg Med, 2022)
- A randomized controlled trial on evaluating clinician-supervised generative AI for decision support. (Int J Med Inform, 2025)
- 2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 7. Pediatric basic life support. (Clin Exp Emerg Med, 2026)