Difficult airway management for novice physicians: a randomized trial comparing direct and video-assisted laryngoscopy.
Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2014-01-29 · Randomised trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To detect a difference in (1) intubation success and (2) successful intubation times between novice physicians using a Macintosh-style or video-assisted laryngoscope on a difficult airway manikin. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. SETTING: Academic, tertiary medical center. METHODS: Forty first-year residents across a variety of disciplines with fewer than 5 total live intubations were recruited for the study. Testing took place during orientation prior to commencement of clinical duties. The entire group was provided training by faculty otolaryngologists and anesthesiologists using both laryngoscope types on a manikin airway simulator in a standard intubating scenario. Subjects were then randomized into 2 testing groups, using either a Macintosh laryngoscope or video-assisted laryngoscope in a difficult intubation scenario. The difficult airway simulation entailed oral cavity/oropharyngeal obstruction using inflation of the tongue, as well as cervical spine immobilization with a rigid collar preventing extension and elevation of the head and limiting oral cavity opening. Success was defined as a confirmed endotracheal intubation by the testing instructor in 120 seconds or less. RESULTS: The Macintosh laryngoscope group (n = 19) had an intubation success rate of 47.4% with a mean intubation time of 69.0 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.7, 85.2). The video-assisted group (n = 21) demonstrated a significantly higher success rate of 100% (P < .0001) and a decreased mean intubation time of 23.1 seconds (95% CI: 18.4, 27.8; P < .0001). The mean difference in success rate between groups was 52.6% (95% CI: 30.0%, 75.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Novice physicians with little to no prior intubation experience showed significantly higher intubation success with lower intubation times using a video-assisted laryngoscope in a difficult airway manikin simulator.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Endotracheal intubation · Video laryngoscopy
Related articles
- Comparison of outcomes between video laryngoscopy and flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy for endotracheal intubation in adults with cervical neck immobilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (PLoS One, 2024)
- Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient. (Can J Anaesth, 2021)
- Video laryngoscopy does not improve the intubation outcomes in emergency and critical patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (Crit Care, 2017)
- Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy use by experienced anaesthetists in patients with known difficult airways: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Anaesthesia, 2017)
- The difficult airway with recommendations for management--part 2--the anticipated difficult airway. (Can J Anaesth, 2013)
- Teleguidance-Facilitated Airway Management in Prehospital Emergency Medical Services: A High-Fidelity Randomized Controlled Simulation Study. (J Emerg Med, 2026)