Cost-effectiveness of a national public access defibrillation programme.
Resuscitation · 2015-03-28 · Observational study
Abstract
AIM: Proposed Irish legislation aimed at increasing survival from out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA) mandates the provision of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in a comprehensive range of publicly accessible premises in urban and rural areas. This study estimated the clinical and cost effectiveness of the legislation, compared with alternative programme configurations involving more targeted AED placement. METHODS: We used a cost-utility analysis to estimate the costs and consequences of public access defibrillation (PAD) programmes from a societal perspective, based on AED deployment by building type. Comparator programmes ranged from those that only included building types with the highest incidence of OHCA, to the comprehensive programme outline in the proposed legislation. Data on OHCA incidence and outcomes were obtained from the Irish Out-of-Hospital-Cardiac-Arrest Register (OHCAR). Costs were obtained from the Irish health service, device suppliers and training providers. RESULTS: The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the most comprehensive PAD scheme was €928,450/QALY. The ICER for the most scaled-back programme involving AED placement in transport stations, medical practices, entertainment venues, schools (excluding primary) and fitness facilities was €95,640/QALY. A 40% increase in AED utilisation when OHCAs occur in a public area could potentially render this programme cost effective. CONCLUSION: National PAD programmes involving widespread deployment of static AEDs are unlikely to be cost-effective. To improve cost-effectiveness any prospective programmes should target locations with the highest incidence of OHCA and be supported by efforts to increase AED utilisation, such as improving public awareness, increasing CPR and AED training, and establishing an EMS-linked AED register.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Automated external defibrillator · Cost & cost-effectiveness · Quality of life & function · Rural & remote · Urban
Related articles
- Location of cardiac arrest in a city center: strategic placement of automated external defibrillators in public locations. (Circulation, 2009)
- Can drones save lives and money? An economic evaluation of airborne delivery of automated external defibrillators. (Eur J Health Econ, 2023)
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of a rural/urban first-responder defibrillation program. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2000)
- Prospective assessment of integrating the existing emergency medical system with automated external defibrillators fully operated by volunteers and laypersons for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Brescia Early Defibrillation Study (BEDS). (Eur Heart J, 2006)
- Location-resolved performance of public-access defibrillation in an urban EMS system: a population-based study in Yokohama, Japan. (Resusc Plus, 2026)
- Cost-effectiveness of a community first responder system for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Belgium. (Open Heart, 2025)