Prehospital
Literature Index
Workforce & occupational health

A biomechanical and subjective comparison of two powered ambulance cots.

Carolyn M Sommerich, Steven A Lavender, Radin Zaid Radin Umar, Jing Li, SangHyun Park, Mohini Dutt

Ergonomics · 2015-01-01 · Observational study

Read at publisher · PubMed

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study investigated biomechanical effects of different leg folding/unfolding mechanisms used for loading/unloading two powered cots (Cots A and B) into and from a simulated ambulance. Sixteen experienced emergency medical service (EMS) workers loaded and unloaded cots with weights of 45, 68 and 91 kg placed on the cots to simulate patients. Peak back and shoulder/arm muscle activity was reduced 52-87% when using Cot A in comparison to Cot B. Peak ground reaction force (PGRF) was reduced by 74% with Cot A. Adding weight resulted in increased muscle activity and PGRF when using Cot B, but had little effect when using Cot A. Task time was longer with Cot A, though was not perceived unfavourably by participants. This study confirmed that it is possible to substantially reduce physical stress imposed on EMS workers when loading and unloading a cot to and from an ambulance through improvements in cot design. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: This study compared two powered ambulance cots, one that lifts/lowers the front and rear wheels independently and one that lifts/lowers the four wheels simultaneously during ambulance loading and unloading. Measured muscle activity, ground reaction forces and operator perceptions support using cot designs that lift/lower the front and rear wheels independently.

Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal

Tags

Ambulance vehicle & crash safety · Paramedics & EMTs · Patient handling equipment

Related articles