Should we still use motor vehicle intrusion as a sole triage criterion for the use of trauma center resources?
Injury · 2015-10-26 · Observational study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle intrusion (MVI) is one of the field triage criteria recommended by the American College of Surgeons Committee of Trauma (ACS-COT) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). However, the evidence supporting its validity is scarce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of this criterion and assess its impact on overtriage or undertriage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study based on the Los Angeles County Trauma and Emergency Medicine Information System (TEMIS) Trauma database. Included in the analysis were patients with MVI as the sole criterion for trauma center triage. Physiological characteristics, severity of injury, and outcomes of the MVI patients were compared between different age groups. Further, a logistic regression model was used to identify factors significantly associated with the need for trauma center resources. RESULTS: During the period 2002-2012, a total of 10,554 trauma patients involved in motor vehicle crashes had documentation of MVI. A subgroup of 3998 patients (37.9%) did not meet any other criteria that require immediate transportation to a designated trauma center. Only 0.7% of these patients had hypotension and 0.1% had deterioration of the Glasgow Coma Scale on admission to the emergency room. Overall, 18.8% of patients required trauma center resources defined as intubation in the emergency room, certain surgical procedures, in-hospital death, or intensive care unit admission. Age ≥65 years, male gender, prehospital heart rate >100/min, and systolic blood pressure <110 mmHg were significantly associated with the need for trauma center resources. CONCLUSIONS: The MVI itself did not appear to be a strong indicator for the use of trauma center resources and is associated with excessive overtriage. However, age >65 years, systolic blood pressure <110 mmHg, and heart rate >100/min were significant predictors for the need of trauma center resources. The MVI criterion should be refined for better utilization of trauma center resources.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Mortality & survival · Older adults · Triage instruments
Related articles
- Systolic blood pressure criteria in the National Trauma Triage Protocol for geriatric trauma: 110 is the new 90. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2015)
- Undertriaged trauma patients: Who are we missing? (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2019)
- Effect of Geriatric-Specific Trauma Triage Criteria on Outcomes in Injured Older Adults: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study. (J Am Geriatr Soc, 2016)
- Evaluating performance and potential clinical benefit of the Swedish On Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP) model for prehospital field triage on Norwegian trauma data. (Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2026)
- Triage of elderly trauma patients: a population-based perspective. (J Am Coll Surg, 2013)
- Advancing age and trauma: triage destination compliance and mortality in Victoria, Australia. (Injury, 2014)