Development of an education campaign to reduce delays in pre-hospital response to stroke.
BMC Emergency Medicine · 2017-06-24 · Implementation & quality improvement
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews call for well-designed trials with clearly described intervention components to support the effectiveness of educational campaigns to reduce patient delay in stroke presentation. We herein describe the systematic development process of a campaign aimed to increase stroke awareness and preparedness. METHODS: Campaign development followed Intervention Mapping (IM), a theory- and evidence-based tool, and was articulated in two phases: needs assessment and intervention development. In phase 1, two cross-sectional surveys were performed, one aiming to measure stroke awareness in the target population and the other to analyze the behavioral determinants of prehospital delay. In phase 2, a matrix of proximal program objectives was developed, theory-based intervention methods and practical strategies were selected and program components and materials produced. RESULTS: In phase 1, the survey on 202 citizens highlighted underestimation of symptom severity, as in only 44% of stroke situations respondents would choose to call the emergency service (EMS). In the survey on 393 consecutive patients, 55% presented over 2 hours after symptom onset; major determinants were deciding to call the general practitioner first and the reaction of the first person the patient called. In phase 2, adult individuals were identified as the target of the intervention, both as potential "patients" and witnesses of stroke. The low educational level found in the patient survey called for a narrative approach in cartoon form. The family setting was chosen for the message because 42% of patients who presented within 2 hours had been advised by a family member to call EMS. To act on people's tendency to view stroke as an untreatable disease, it was decided to avoid fear-arousal appeals and use a positive message providing instructions and hope. Focus groups were used to test educational products and identify the most suitable sites for message dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: The IM approach allowed to develop a stroke campaign integrating theories, scientific evidence and information collected from the target population, and enabled to provide clear explanations for the reasons behind key decisions during the intervention development process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01881152 . Retrospectively registered June 7 2013.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Related articles
- Methodology for a community-based stroke preparedness intervention: the Acute Stroke Program of Interventions Addressing Racial and Ethnic Disparities Study. (Stroke, 2014)
- Behavioral Determinants Potentially Relevant to First-Witness Responses in Prehospital Stroke Care: A COM-B-Based Scoping Review. (Healthcare (Basel), 2026)
- Impact of emergency fast track on treatment time and outcomes in acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (BMC Emerg Med, 2025)
- Organizational Factors Determining Access to Reperfusion Therapies in Ischemic Stroke-Systematic Literature Review. (Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022)
- Effectiveness of Public Education Campaigns for Stroke Symptom Recognition and Response in Non-Elderly Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2022)
- Stroke literacy in a sample of Italian adults: an iceberg model revealing domain-specific gaps beyond apparent emergency awareness. (Neurol Sci, 2026)