Military medical research in Britain and the USA: the challenge of informed consent.
Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps · 2018-10-15 · Systematic review
Abstract
Military medical research requires informed consent from test subjects, which is difficult to obtain for deployed (in-theatre) or prehospital studies where patients are incapacitated and legal representatives are not available. Although US and UK regulations make provisions for exceptions to informed consent, these are rarely used, thereby hindering trauma research and prospective experimental studies of new devices, surgeries or drugs. In their place, a survey of research articles published in the Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps and Military Medicine between 2004 and 2018 shows how researchers turned to clinical surveys and retrospective, case or animal studies instead. The reluctance to enrol military personnel in interventional studies stems from past instances of abuse and current misperceptions of soldiers as a particularly vulnerable class of research subjects. Increasing the pool of research subjects to facilitate interventional studies to improve combat casualty care requires honing military medical ethics in two ways. First, it is important to implement existing informed consent regulations without special regard for the status of service personnel. This will expedite approval of waivers of informed consent. Second, aggressively recruiting civilians for military-related medical research increases the number of subjects available for trauma research. Community consultation and public discourse are the proper venues to deliberate on each recommendation.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Military & tactical · Ethics · Research methods & trial conduct
Related articles
- Research and conflict: mapping research trends and gaps in Ukrainian Emergency Medical Services- a scoping review. (Confl Health, 2025)
- An Innovative Civilian Research Model to Inform Combat-Relevant Prolonged Casualty Care. (Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex), 2022)
- Prehospital and emergency care research at the US Army Institute of Surgical Research: enabling the next great leap in combat casualty survival. (US Army Med Dep J, 2011)
- Review of military and civilian trauma registries: Does consensus matter? (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2017)
- NATO Blood Panel perspectives on changes to military prehospital resuscitation policies: current and future practice. (Transfusion, 2016)
- Ethical considerations in embedding a surgeon in a military or civilian tactical team. (Prehosp Disaster Med, 2012)