Personalized Prehospital Triage in Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Stroke · 2019-01-22 · Method & validation
Abstract
Background and Purpose- Direct transportation to a center with facilities for endovascular treatment might be beneficial for patients with acute ischemic stroke, but it can also cause harm by delay of intravenous treatment. Our aim was to determine the optimal prehospital transportation strategy for individual patients and to assess which factors influence this decision. Methods- We constructed a decision tree model to compare outcome of ischemic stroke patients after transportation to a primary stroke center versus a more distant intervention center. The optimal strategy was estimated based on individual patient characteristics, geographic location, and workflow times. In the base case scenario, the primary stroke center was located at 20 minutes and the intervention center at 45 minutes. Additional sensitivity analyses included an urban scenario (10 versus 20 minutes) and a rural scenario (30 versus 90 minutes). Results- Direct transportation to the intervention center led to better outcomes in the base case scenario when the likelihood of a large vessel occlusion as a cause of the ischemic stroke was >33%. With a high likelihood of large vessel occlusion (66%, comparable with a Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation score of 5 or above), the benefit of direct transportation to the intervention center was 0.10 quality-adjusted life years (=36 days in full health). In the urban scenario, direct transportation to an intervention center was beneficial when the risk of large vessel occlusion was 24% or higher. In the rural scenario, this threshold was 49%. Other factors influencing the decision included door-to-needle times, door-to-groin times, and the door-in-door-out time. Conclusions- The preferred prehospital transportation strategy for suspected stroke patients depends mainly on the likelihood of large vessel occlusion, driving times, and in-hospital workflow times. We constructed a robust model that combines these characteristics and can be used to personalize prehospital triage, especially in more remote areas.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Decision support tools · Quality of life & function · Rural & remote · Time intervals · Triage instruments · Urban
Related articles
- Workflows and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Triaged in Urban and Nonurban Areas. (Stroke, 2022)
- 'Drive the doctor' for endovascular thrombectomy in a rural area: a simulation study. (BMC Health Serv Res, 2023)
- Geographical Requirements for the Applicability of the Results of the RACECAT Study to Other Stroke Networks. (J Am Heart Assoc, 2023)
- Pre-hospital Triage of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients-Importance of Considering More Than Two Transport Options. (Front Neurol, 2019)
- Quality assurance monitoring of a citywide transportation protocol improves clinical indicators of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator therapy: a community-based, longitudinal study. (J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2015)
- Effectiveness of mobile stroke units in reducing time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a scoping review. (Int J Emerg Med, 2025)