Predicting acute coronary syndrome in males and females with chest pain who call an emergency medical communication centre.
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · 2019-10-17 · Method & validation
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chest pain is a frequent reason for calls in emergency medical communication centre (EMCC). Detecting a coronary origin by phone is a challenge. This is especially so as the presentations differ according to gender. We aimed to establish and validate a sex-based model to predict a coronary origin of chest pain in patients calling an EMCC. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients at 18 years of age or older who called the EMCC because of non-traumatic chest pain. The main outcome was the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) determined by expert evaluation of patient files. RESULTS: During 18 months, 3727 patients were enrolled: 2097 (56%) men and 1630 (44%) women. ACS was diagnosed in 508 (24%) men and 139 (9%) women. For men, independent factors associated with an ACS diagnosis were age, tobacco use, severe and permanent pain; retrosternal, breathing non-related and radiating pain; and additional symptoms. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.79) for predicting ACS. The accuracy of the male model to predict ACS was validated in a validation dataset (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.554); the AUC was 0.77 (95%CI 0.73-0.80). For women, independent factors associated with an ACS diagnosis were age ≥ 60 years, personal history of coronary artery disease, and breathing non-related and radiating pain. The AUC was 0.79 (95%CI 0.75-0.83). The accuracy of the female model to predict ACS was not validated in the validation dataset (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.035); the AUC was 0.67 (95%CI 0.60-0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of an ACS diagnosis in patients calling an EMCC for chest pain differ between men and women. We developed an accurate predictive model for men, but for women, the accuracy was poor. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02042209 ).
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Decision support tools · Dispatchers & call takers · Sex & gender
Related articles
- trIAje project: protocol for a retrospective cohort study to optimise AI-assisted telephone triage of time-sensitive conditions in emergency medical services. (BMJ Open, 2026)
- Does sex influence the allocation of life support level by dispatchers in acute chest pain? (Am J Emerg Med, 2010)
- Artificial intelligence in Emergency Medical Services dispatching: assessing the potential impact of an automatic speech recognition software on stroke detection taking the Capital Region of Denmark as case in point. (Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2022)
- Telephonic description of sepsis among callers to an emergency dispatch centre in South Africa. (Afr J Emerg Med, 2020)
- TeLePhone Respiratory (TeLePoR) score to assess the risk of immediate respiratory support through phone call for acute dyspnoea: a prospective cohort study. (Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2025)
- Intelligent mobile voice information centre system: Taking the emergency triage support system as an example. (Stud Health Technol Inform, 2006)