Efficacy of Macrolides on Acute Asthma or Wheezing Exacerbations in Children with Recurrent Wheezing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Paediatric drugs · 2020-01-16 · Systematic review
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The role of macrolides for treatment of children with acute asthma or wheezing exacerbations is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of macrolides in children with recurrent wheezing presenting with acute asthma or wheezing exacerbation. METHODS: We conducted an electronic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of macrolides (any macrolide) compared with placebo or standard treatment in children up to 18 years with recurrent wheezing/asthma presenting with an acute exacerbation. OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes were need for hospitalization and/or time of acute asthma/wheezing symptoms resolution; secondary outcomes were duration of stay in the emergency department (ED)/clinic, severity of symptoms of the index episode, use of additional systemic corticosteroids or short active β-2 agonists, changes in lung function measures, ED visit/hospitalization during first week after index episode, time to next exacerbation, or adverse effects (AEs). RESULTS: Only three studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 334 children, 410 treated episodes); two studies included recurrent wheezers and the third included asthmatic children. There was no difference in hospitalization between groups, but children treated with macrolides had a significantly lower time to symptoms resolution than controls, although the magnitude of benefit remains to be quantified due to no normal distribution data presented. There was no difference in time to next episode of exacerbation (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.71-1.28; I2 = 0%; p = 0.77). In one study, children receiving macrolides had a significant decrease in the severity of symptoms, decrease use of salbutamol, and another study showed improved lung function. No study evaluated antibiotic resistance development. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence support that a macrolide trial could be considered in children with acute asthma or recurrent wheezing exacerbation.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Antibiotics · Children · Other drugs
Related articles
- [Update on the management of acute viral bronchiolitis: proposed guidelines of Grand Ouest University Hospitals]. (Arch Pediatr, 2014)
- Clinical Outcomes for Emergency Department Presentations of Sepsis Managed on a Clinical Pathway: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (Healthcare (Basel), 2026)
- Effectiveness of Intravenous and Nebulized MgSO4 in Children with Asthma Exacerbation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials. (Children (Basel), 2025)
- Intravenous Bronchodilators in Pediatric Critical Asthma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. (Pediatr Pulmonol, 2025)
- Second-line treatment option for children aged 18 years and under with an acute severe asthma exacerbation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. (Arch Dis Child, 2025)
- Use of intravenous magnesium sulfate in addition to standard first-line treatment with inhaled/nebulised short-acting beta 2 agonist and systemic steroids in the management of acute asthma exacerbations in children: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. (Arch Dis Child, 2025)