Trauma-team-activation in Germany: how do emergency service professionals use the activation due to trauma mechanism? Results from a nationwide survey.
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery · 2020-06-24 · Observational study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trauma team activation (TTA) requires significant human and financial resources. The implemented German guidelines reduced the mortality of severe injured patients significantly over the last decade. Up to now there is no two-tier trauma team activation protocol in Germany. A two-tier TTA [often activated due to trauma mechanism (TM)] is thought to be a reasonable way to maintain patient safety while increasing cost efficiency. METHODS: We created an online survey addressed at the Emergency Medical Service in Germany to conduct a cross-sectional study. Both physicians and rescue service professionals (RSPs) were included. A minimum of 1550 participants answered questions in 4 different categories concerning the aspects of limited-TTA (L-TTA). Case studies were presented to evaluate the usage of TTA due to TM in the daily routine. RESULTS: Eighty percent (n:1233) of the respondents wish for a possibility to activate a limited trauma team. Seventy-two percent (n: 1109) of the participants consider a L-TTA due to TM to be adequate. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the assessment and opinion on L-TTA among physicians and RSPs as well as different medical professions. The evaluated case studies showed diverse answers: depending on the profession, the same patient was ranked as severely injured by 54% and as minorly injured by 46% of the 1550 participants. CONCLUSIONS: Members of the German Emergency Medical Service call for a two-tier TTA-protocol. Up to now we cannot fully recommend an automatic reduction of the trauma team when activated due to TM in Germany with the guidelines implemented. The profession might affect the L-TTA-behavior. Criteria for a L-TTA in Germany have to be defined and evaluated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, cross-sectional study.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Paramedics & EMTs · Prehospital physicians · Triage instruments
Related articles
- Precision of field triage in patients brought to a trauma centre after introducing trauma team activation guidelines. (Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2009)
- Physician-led prehospital management is associated with reduced mortality in severe blunt trauma patients: a retrospective analysis of the Japanese nationwide trauma registry. (Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2021)
- The effect of the introduction of a regional major trauma network on triage decisions made by a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service. (Eur J Emerg Med, 2015)
- Efficacy of the presence of an emergency physician in prehospital major trauma care: A nationwide cohort study in Japan. (Am J Emerg Med, 2019)
- Does the presence of an emergency physician influence pre-hospital time, pre-hospital interventions and the mortality of severely injured patients? A matched-pair analysis based on the trauma registry of the German Trauma Society (TraumaRegister DGU®). (Injury, 2017)
- Evaluation of the performance of French physician-staffed emergency medical service in the triage of major trauma patients. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2014)