Development and testing of Australian prehospital care quality indicators: study protocol.
BMJ Open · 2020-07-30 · Study protocol
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Historically, ambulance services were established to provide rapid transport of patients to hospital. Contemporary prehospital care involves provision of sophisticated 'mobile healthcare' to patients across the lifespan presenting with a range of injuries or illnesses of varying acuity. Because of its young age, the paramedicine profession has until recently experienced a lack of research capacity which has led to paucity of a discipline-specific, scientific evidence-base. Therefore, the performance and quality of ambulance services has traditionally been measured using simple, evidence-poor indicators forming a deficient reflection of the true quality of care and providing little direction for quality improvement efforts. This paper reports the study protocol for the development and testing of quality indicators (QIs) for the Australian prehospital care setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This project has three phases. In the first phase, preliminary work in the form of a scoping review was conducted which provided an initial list of QIs. In the subsequent phase, these QIs will be developed by aggregating them and by performing related rapid reviews. The summarised evidence will be used to support an expert consensus process aimed at optimising the clarity and evaluating the validity of proposed QIs. Finally, in the third phase those QIs deemed valid will be tested for acceptability, feasibility and reliability using mixed research methods. Evidence-based indicators can facilitate meaningful measurement of the quality of care provided. This forms the first step to identify unwarranted variation and direction for improvement work. This project will develop and test quality indicators for the Australian prehospital care setting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project has been approved by the University of Adelaide Human Research Ethics Committee. Findings will be disseminated by publications in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at appropriate scientific conferences, as well as posts on social media and on the project's website.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Implementation · Research methods & trial conduct
Related articles
- Multi-method versus single method appraisal of clinical quality indicators for the emergency medical services. (Int J Qual Health Care, 2021)
- Opportunities and barriers for prehospital emergency medical services research in the Netherlands; results of a mixed-methods consensus study. (Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2024)
- 2022 Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Care. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2023)
- A national model for developing, implementing, and evaluating evidence-based guidelines for prehospital care. (Acad Emerg Med, 2012)
- Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Prehospital Evidence-Based Guidelines. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2023)
- Data missingness in the Michigan NEMSIS (MI-EMSIS) dataset: a mixed-methods study. (Int J Emerg Med, 2021)