Secondary transfer of emergency stroke patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy by air in rural England: economic evaluation and considerations.
Emergency Medicine Journal · 2020-11-10 · Other / unclear
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a time-sensitive emergency procedure for patients who had ischaemic stroke leading to improved health outcomes. Health systems need to ensure that MT is delivered to as many patients as quickly as possible. Using decision modelling, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of secondary transfer by helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) compared with ground emergency medical services (GEMS) of rural patients eligible for MT in England. METHODS: The model consisted of (1) a short-run decision tree with two branches, representing secondary transfer transportation strategies and (2) a long-run Markov model for a theoretical population of rural patients with a confirmed ischaemic stroke. Strategies were compared by lifetime costs: quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost per QALY gained and net monetary benefit. Sensitivity and scenario analyses explored uncertainty around parameter values. RESULTS: We used the base case of early-presenting (<6 hours to arterial puncture) patient aged 75 years who had stroke to compare HEMS and GEMS. This produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £28 027 when a 60 min reduction in travel time was assumed. Scenario analyses showed the importance of the reduction in travel time and futile transfers in lowering ICERs. For late presenting (>6 hours to arterial puncture), ground transportation is the dominant strategy. CONCLUSION: Our model indicates that using HEMS to transfer patients who had stroke eligible for MT from remote hospitals in England may be cost-effective when: travel time is reduced by at least 60 min compared with GEMS, and a £30 000/QALY threshold is used for decision-making. However, several other logistic considerations may impact on the use of air transportation.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Helicopter & air ambulance · Cost & cost-effectiveness · Interfacility & critical care transport · Rural & remote · Time intervals
Related articles
- Adopting the pre-hospital index for interfacility helicopter transport: a proposal. (Injury, 2003)
- Optimizing remote and rural prehospital resources using air transport of thrombectomy candidates. (Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2024)
- Helicopter emergency medical service for time critical interfacility transfers of patients with cardiovascular emergencies. (Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2021)
- Comparison of Interfacility Transfer of Critically Ill Pediatric Patients by Helicopter Versus Ground Ambulance in a Remote and Rural Domain. (Air Med J, 2024)
- Pre- and inter-hospital transport of severely head-injured patients in rural Northern Norway. (J Neurotrauma, 2003)
- Air Medical Support for a Peripheral Hospital in Southern Israel: An Evolving Role for the Air Ambulance and Emergency Department Clinicians. (Air Med J, 2023)