An Analysis of Conflicts Across Role 1 Guidelines.
Military Medicine · 2020-11-25 · Guideline / consensus
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Role 1 care is vital to patient survival and includes many echelons of care from point-of-injury first aid to medical attention at battalion aid stations. Many guidelines are written for Role 1 care providers to optimize care for different scenarios. Differences in the guidelines lead to confusion and discrepancies between the types of treatment medical care providers provide. Although the guidelines were written for different areas of care, uniformity between the guidelines is needed and will lead to a reduced mortality rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was determined that the Tactical Combat Casualty Care Guidelines, Prolonged Field Care Guidelines, Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guidelines, and Standard Medical Operating Guidelines from medical evacuation were the military medical guidelines most relevant to Role 1 care. These Guidelines were compared side by side to determine the differences between them. RESULTS: Although the guidelines were largely similar, many major differences were found between them. Our online tables contain large inconsistences between guidelines including direct contradictions in conversion of junctional tourniquets and the administration of tranexamic acid. CONCLUSIONS: Role 1 care is vital to patient survival, including care from point of injury to battalion aid stations, but the guidelines available to instruct this care and the guidance on which personnel should provide this care are conflicting. This lack of clarity and consistency may adversely impact treatment outcomes. The reduction or elimination of conflicting information across the various guidelines, augmentation of guidance for pediatric care, more specific guidance for unique levels of care, and clearer delineation of the Role 1 phases of care (as well as which guidelines are most appropriate to each) should be considered as urgent priorities within the military medical community.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Haemostatics · Military & tactical · Tourniquet · Tranexamic acid
Related articles
- Initial management of haemorrhagic war casualties: tactical priorities and innovative approaches in modern and future warfare. (Crit Care, 2025)
- An Analysis of Adherence to Tactical Combat Casualty Care Guidelines for the Administration of Tranexamic Acid. (J Emerg Med, 2019)
- Saving Lives on the Battlefield (Part II) ? One Year Later A Joint Theater Trauma System and Joint Trauma System Review of Prehospital Trauma Care in Combined Joint Operations Area?Afghanistan (CJOA-A) Final Report, 30 May 2014. (J Spec Oper Med, 2015)
- Advances in military resuscitation. (Emerg Nurse, 2016)
- Trends in combat casualty care following the publication of clinical practice guidelines. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2021)
- Retrospective analysis of tranexamic acid administration in French war-wounded between October 2016 and September 2020. (BMJ Mil Health, 2024)