Management of first responder programmes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe.
Resuscitation Plus · 2021-01-02 · Observational study
Abstract
AIM: First responder (FR) programmes dispatch professional FRs (police and/or firefighters) or citizen responders to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use automated external defibrillators (AED) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We aimed to describe management of FR-programmes across Europe in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: In June 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey sent to OHCA registry representatives in 18 European countries with active FR-programmes. The survey was administered by e-mail and included questions regarding management of both citizen responder and FR-programmes. A follow-up question was conducted in October 2020 assessing management during a potential "second wave" of COVID-19. RESULTS: All representatives responded (response rate = 100%). Fourteen regions dispatched citizen responders and 17 regions dispatched professional FRs (9 regions dispatched both). Responses were post-hoc divided into three categories: FR activation continued unchanged, FR activation continued with restrictions, or FR activation temporarily paused. For citizen responders, regions either temporarily paused activation (n = 7, 50.0%) or continued activation with restrictions (n = 7, 50.0%). The most common restriction was to omit rescue breaths and perform compression-only CPR. For professional FRs, nine regions continued activation with restrictions (52.9%) and five regions (29.4%) continued activation unchanged, but with personal protective equipment available for the professional FRs. In three regions (17.6%), activation of professional FRs temporarily paused. CONCLUSION: Most regions changed management of FR-programmes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies are needed to investigate the consequences of pausing or restricting FR-programmes for bystander CPR and AED use, and how this may impact patient outcome.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Automated external defibrillator · Alerted volunteer responders · COVID-19 pandemic · Personal protective equipment · Fire service & police
Related articles
- Cost-benefit analysis of partnership working between fire and rescue and health services across England and Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic. (BMJ Open, 2023)
- Medical care and first aid: an interassociation consensus framework for organised non-elite sport during the COVID-19 pandemic. (Br J Sports Med, 2022)
- Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Public-Access Defibrillation and System Approaches to Minimize Avoidable Delay. (J Clin Med, 2026)
- Cost-Effectiveness of a Community First Responder System for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Poland. (Clinicoecon Outcomes Res, 2025)
- The impact of safety leadership on safety behaviors of aircraft rescue and firefighting personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. (Int J Occup Saf Ergon, 2025)
- Automated external defibrillators and the link to first responder systems. (Curr Opin Crit Care, 2023)