An Observation of Application of Structural Brain Injury Devices for Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation in Austere Military Prehospital Settings.
Military Medicine · 2021-01-25 · Observational study
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Military units lack the ability to quickly, objectively, and accurately assess individuals that have suffered a closed head injury for structural brain injury and functional brain impairments in forward settings, where neurological assessment equipment and expertise may be lacking. With acute traumatic brain injury patients, detached medical providers are often faced with a decision to wait and observe or medically evacuate, both of which have cascading consequences. Structural brain injury assessment devices, when employed in forward environments, have the potential to reduce the risk of undiagnosed and/or mismanaged traumatic brain injuries given their high negative predictive value and suggested increased specificity compared to common subjective clinical decision rules. These handheld devices are portable and have an ease of use, from combat medic to physician, allowing for use in austere environments, safely keeping soldiers with their teams when able and suggesting further evaluation via computed tomography (CT) scan when warranted. METHODS: Data collected on 13 encounters at 5 locations were retrospectively analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total number of 13 examinations were performed using the BrainScope One device during the 9-month deployment. The Structural Injury Classification was negative for 11 of the patients. Two of the 11 patients underwent head CT scans, which confirmed the absence of intracranial hemorrhage. Of the two positive Structural Injury Classification exams, one was CT negative and no CT was performed for the other based on clinical judgment. CONCLUSION: The data from this study suggest that structural brain injury devices may provide value by ruling out serious brain injury pathology while limiting excessive medical evacuations from austere settings, where neurological assessment equipment and expertise may be lacking, reducing unnecessary head CT scans.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Decision support tools · Low- and middle-income settings · Military & tactical
Related articles
- Overview of Wearable Healthcare Devices for Clinical Decision Support in the Prehospital Setting. (Sensors (Basel), 2024)
- Explosive Weapons Trauma Care Collective (EXTRACCT) Blast Injury Clinical Practice Guideline: Traumatic Brain Injury From Blast and Penetrating Mechanisms in Settings With Variable Resource Availability. (World J Surg, 2026)
- Use of Digital Clinical Decision Support System Increases Adherence to Provision of Evidence-Based Interventions for Elevated Intracranial Pressure During Simulated Care of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. (Prehosp Disaster Med, 2026)
- Crossing the blood-brain barrier: neurotrauma in disasters and resource-limited settings. (Trauma Surg Acute Care Open, 2026)
- Hypertonic Saline for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury With Herniation: A Military Prehospital Case Report. (J Spec Oper Med, 2022)
- Decision Support for Tactical Combat Casualty Care Using Machine Learning to Detect Shock. (Mil Med, 2021)