External validation of the Dutch prediction model for prehospital triage of trauma patients in South West region of England, United Kingdom.
Injury · 2021-01-28 · Method & validation
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: This paper investigates the use of a major trauma prediction model in the UK setting. We demonstrate that application of this model could reduce the number of patients with major trauma being incorrectly sent to non-specialist hospitals. However, more research is needed to reduce over-triage and unnecessary transfer to Major Trauma Centres. OBJECTIVE: To externally validate the Dutch prediction model for identifying major trauma in a large unselected prehospital population of injured patients in England. DESIGN: External validation using a retrospective cohort of injured patients who ambulance crews transported to hospitals. SETTING: South West region of England. PARTICIPANTS: All patients ≥16 years with a suspected injury and transported by ambulance in the year from February 1, 2017. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: 1) Patients aged ≤15 years; 2) Non-ambulance attendance at hospital with injuries; 3) Death at the scene and; 4) Patients conveyed by helicopter. This study had a census sample of cases available to us over a one year period. INTERVENTIONS OR EXPOSURES: Tested the accuracy of the prediction model in terms of discrimination, calibration, clinical usefulness, sensitivity and specificity and under- and over triage rates compared to usual triage practices in the South West region. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Major trauma defined as an Injury Severity Score>15. RESULTS: A total of 68799 adult patients were included in the external validation cohort. The median age of patients was 72 (i.q.r. 46-84); 55.5% were female; and 524 (0.8%) had an Injury Severity Score>15. The model achieved good discrimination with a C-Statistic 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73 - 0.78). The maximal specificity of 50% and sensitivity of 83% suggests the model could improve undertriage rates at the expense of increased overtriage rates compared with routine trauma triage methods used in the South West, England. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The Dutch prediction model for identifying major trauma could lower the undertriage rate to 17%, however it would increase the overtriage rate to 50% in this United Kingdom cohort. Further prospective research is needed to determine whether the model can be practically implemented by paramedics and is cost-effective.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Decision support tools · Older adults · Paramedics & EMTs · Triage instruments
Related articles
- Evaluating performance and potential clinical benefit of the Swedish On Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP) model for prehospital field triage on Norwegian trauma data. (Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2026)
- Diagnostic accuracy of prehospital triage tools for identifying major trauma in elderly injured patients: A systematic review. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2021)
- Evaluation of the New South Wales ambulance T1 major trauma transport protocol: A state-wide data linkage study. (Injury, 2023)
- Comorbidities, anticoagulants, and geriatric-specific physiology for the field triage of injured older adults. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2019)
- Developing a simple field triage scheme compatible with regional trauma situations and medical systems using machine learning: A nationwide trauma database study (Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2024)
- Accuracy of a Prehospital Triage Protocol in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality and Severe Trauma Cases among Older Adults. (Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2023)