Acute Stroke Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Reduction in the Number of Admissions of Elderly Patients and Increase in Prehospital Delays.
Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021-01-01 · Observational study
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We analyzed whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis affected acute stroke care in our center during the first 2 months of lockdown in Spain. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective study. We collected demographic, clinical, and radiological data; time course; and treatment of patients meeting the stroke unit admission criteria from March 14 to May 14, 2020 (COVID-19 period group). Data were compared with the same period in 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period group). RESULTS: 195 patients were analyzed; 83 in the COVID-19 period group, resulting in a 26% decline of acute strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) admitted to our center compared with the previous year (p = 0.038). Ten patients (12%) tested positive for PCR SARS-CoV-2. The proportion of patients aged 65 years and over was lower in the COVID-19 period group (53 vs. 68.8%, p = 0.025). During the pandemic period, analyzed patients were more frequently smokers (27.7 vs. 10.7%, p = 0.002) and had less frequently history of prior stroke (13.3 vs. 25%, p = 0.043) or atrial fibrillation (9.6 vs. 25%, p = 0.006). ASPECTS score was lower (9 [7-10] vs. 10 [8-10], p = 0.032), NIHSS score was slightly higher (5 [2-14] vs. 4 [2-8], p = 0.122), onset-to-door time was higher (304 [93-760] vs. 197 [91.25-645] min, p = 0.104), and a lower proportion arrived within 4.5 h from onset of symptoms (43.4 vs. 58%, p = 0.043) during the CO-VID-19 period. There were no differences between proportion of patients receiving recanalization treatment (intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy) and in-hospital delays. CONCLUSION: We observed a reduction in the number of acute strokes and TIAs admitted during the COVID-19 period. This drop affected especially elderly patients, and despite a delay in their arrival to the emergency department, the proportion of patients treated with recanalization therapies was preserved.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Time intervals · Older adults · COVID-19 pandemic
Related articles
- A Decade of Transformation in Stroke Care in South Korea (2013-2023): Increasing Ambulance Use but Persistent Prehospital Delay and Reversing Mortality Trends. (J Stroke, 2026)
- Acute Stroke Care Is at Risk in the Era of COVID-19: Experience at a Comprehensive Stroke Center in Barcelona. (Stroke, 2020)
- Social and clinical vulnerability in stroke and STEMI management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a registry-based study. (BMJ Open, 2024)
- Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prehospital Emergency Care for Adults with Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2024)
- Factors Associated With Prehospital Delay Among Older Adults Surviving Ischemic Stroke: A Cross-Sectional Study. (Brain Behav, 2026)
- Time Lost Is Brain Lost: Insights into Acute Ischaemic Stroke Delays in a Tertiary Care Super-speciality Centre in Jharkhand. (Ann Neurosci, 2026)