Mortality benefit of crystalloids administered in 1-6 hours in septic adults in the ED: systematic review with narrative synthesis.
Emergency Medicine Journal · 2021-04-15 · Systematic review
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Based on the 2018 update of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, the Committee for Quality Improvement of the NHSs of England recommended the instigation of the elements of the 'Sepsis-6 bundle' within 1 hour to adult patients screened positive for sepsis. This bundle includes a bolus infusion of 30 mL/kg crystalloids in the ED. Besides the UK, both in the USA and Australia, compliance with similar 1-hour targets became an important quality indicator. However, the supporting evidence may neither be contemporaneous nor necessarily valid for emergency medicine settings. METHOD: A systematic review was designed and registered at PROSPERO to assess available emergency medicine/prehospital evidence published between 2012 and 2020, investigating the clinical benefits associated with a bolus infusion of a minimum 30 mL/kg crystalloids within 1 hour to adult patients screened positive for sepsis. Due to the small number of papers that addressed this volume of fluids in 1 hour, we expanded the search to include studies looking at 1-6 hours. RESULTS: Seven full-text articles were identified, which investigated various aspects of the fluid resuscitation in adult sepsis. However, none answered completely to the original research question aimed to determine either the effect of time-to-crystalloids or the optimal fluid volume of resuscitation. Our findings demonstrated that in the USA/UK/Australia/Canada, adult ED septic patients receive 23-43 mL/kg of crystalloids during the first 6 hours of resuscitation without significant differences either in mortality or in adverse effects. CONCLUSION: This systematic review did not find high-quality evidence supporting the administration of 30 mL/kg crystalloid bolus to adult septic patients within 1 hour of presentation in the ED. Future research must investigate both the benefits and the potential harms of the recommended intervention.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Crystalloids · Fluids & blood · Mortality & survival · Time intervals
Related articles
- Balanced Solutions Versus Normal Saline in Pediatric Septic Shock: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. (J Intensive Care Med, 2026)
- Balanced Crystalloids Versus Normal Saline for Fluid Resuscitation in Pediatric Septic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (J Clin Med Res, 2026)
- Personalized fluid resuscitation may reduce mortality in septic shock as compared with fixed-volume approach - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (Intensive Care Med Exp, 2026)
- Balanced crystalloids versus 0.9% saline for fluid resuscitation in children with septic shock: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (Ir J Med Sci, 2026)
- Hyperoncotic Albumin (20%) Versus Crystalloids for Mortality in Adults with Sepsis and Septic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (Med Sci (Basel), 2026)
- Mortality effect of albumin fluid resuscitation in adults with septic shock: a systematic review and dual frequentist-bayesian meta-analysis of randomised trials. (Crit Care, 2026)