Ultraearly thrombolysis by an anesthesiologist in a mobile stroke unit: A prospective, controlled intervention study.
European Journal of Neurology · 2021-04-24 · Quasi-experimental
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute stroke treatment in mobile stroke units (MSU) is feasible and reduces time-to-treatment, but the optimal staffing model is unknown. We wanted to explore if integrating thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in an anesthesiologist-based emergency medical services (EMS) reduces time-to-treatment and is safe. METHODS: A nonrandomized, prospective, controlled intervention study. INCLUSION CRITERIA: age ≥18 years, nonpregnant, stroke symptoms with onset ≤4 h. The MSU staffing is inspired by the Norwegian Helicopter Emergency Medical Services crew with an anesthesiologist, a paramedic-nurse and a paramedic. Controls were included by conventional ambulances in the same catchment area. Primary outcome was onset-to-treatment time. Secondary outcomes were alarm-to-treatment time, thrombolytic rate and functional outcome. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality. RESULTS: We included 440 patients. MSU median (IQR) onset-to-treatment time was 101 (71-155) minutes versus 118 (90-176) minutes in controls, p = 0.007. MSU median (IQR) alarm-to-treatment time was 53 (44-65) minutes versus 74 (63-95) minutes in controls, p < 0.001. Golden hour treatment was achieved in 15.2% of the MSU patients versus 3.7% in the controls, p = 0.005. The thrombolytic rate was higher in the MSU (81% vs 59%, p = 0.001). MSU patients were more often discharged home (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 2.36 [1.11-5.03]). There were no other significant differences in outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating thrombolysis of AIS in the anesthesiologist-based EMS reduces time-to-treatment without negatively affecting outcomes. An MSU based on the EMS enables prehospital assessment of acute stroke in addition to other medical and traumatic emergencies and may facilitate future implementation.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Antithrombotics & thrombolytics · Mobile stroke unit · Mortality & survival · Prehospital physicians · Quality of life & function · Thrombolytics · Time intervals
Related articles
- Mobile Stroke Units in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 5 "T Letter" Domains. (Cardiol Rev, 2024)
- Mobile stroke unit versus standard medical care in the management of patients with acute stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (Int J Stroke, 2020)
- Outcomes of Patients Receiving Thrombolysis in a Mobile Stroke Unit: A 4-Year Retrospective, Observational, Single-Center Study. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2023)
- Effects of golden hour thrombolysis: a Prehospital Acute Neurological Treatment and Optimization of Medical Care in Stroke (PHANTOM-S) substudy. (JAMA Neurol, 2015)
- Golden Hour Treatment With tPA (Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator) in the BEST-MSU Study. (Stroke, 2023)
- Potential Missed Opportunities to Administer Intravenous Thrombolysis to Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. (Stroke, 2026)