Is tactical combat casualty care in terrorist attacks suitable for civilian first responders?
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2021-07-10 · Systematic review
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Prehospital management of intentional mass casualty incidents is a unique challenge to Emergency Medical Services. Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) and the use of tourniquets for extremity hemorrhage have already proven to reduce mortality on the battlefield. This literature review aims to determine the place of these military concepts in a civilian high-threat prehospital setting. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for articles published between January 1, 2000, and December 1, 2019, containing descriptions, discussions, or experiences of the application of tourniquets or other TCCC-based interventions in the civilian prehospital setting. Data extraction focused on identifying important common themes in the articles. RESULTS: Of the 286 identified articles, 30 were selected for inclusion. According to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence, overall level of evidence was low. Most articles were observational, retrospective cohort studies without a nontourniquet control group. Outcome measures and variables were variably reported. Two articles specifically analyzed tourniquet use during high-threat situations, and three described their application by law enforcement personnel. Overall, tourniquets were found to be effective in stopping major limb bleeding. Reported mortality was low and related complications appeared to be infrequent. Only four articles mentioned the application of other TCCC-based maneuvers, such as airway and respiratory management. CONCLUSION: This literature review shows that tourniquets appear to be safe tools associated with few complications and might be effective in controlling major bleeding in civilian limb trauma. For example, during mass casualty incidents, their use could be justified. Training and equipping ambulance and police services to deal with massive bleeding could likewise improve interoperability and victim survival in a civilian high-threat prehospital setting. More qualitative research is needed to further evaluate the effects of hemorrhage control training for first responders on patient outcomes. Literature describing the application of other TCCC-based principles is limited, which makes it difficult to draw conclusions regarding their use in a civilian setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, level III.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Terror attacks & active shooter events · Interagency collaboration · Military & tactical · Fire service & police · Tourniquet
Related articles
- The Hartford Consensus on Active Shooters: Implementing the Continuum of Prehospital Trauma Response. (J Emerg Med, 2015)
- Improving survival from active shooter events: the Hartford Consensus. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2013)
- A civilian tactical survival chain for incidents involving multiple intentionalinjury victims: the Victory I Consensus Report. (Emergencias, 2019)
- [Mass casualty incident - special features of "threatening situations"]. (Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther, 2017)
- Prairie North: a joint civilian/military mass casualty exercise highlights the role of the National Guard in community disaster response. (Am J Disaster Med, 2012)
- Medical lessons from terror attacks in Israel. (J Emerg Med, 2007)