Prehospital Disaster Triage Does Not Predict Pediatric Outcomes: Comparing the Criteria Outcomes Tool to Three Mass-Casualty Incident Triage Algorithms.
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine · 2021-08-16 · Observational study
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: It remains unclear which mass-casualty incident (MCI) triage tool best predicts outcomes for child disaster victims. STUDY OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare triage outcomes of Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START), modified START, and CareFlight in pediatric patients to an outcomes-based gold standard using the Criteria Outcomes Tool (COT). The secondary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, under-triage, over-triage, and overall accuracy at each level for each MCI triage algorithm. METHODS: Singleton trauma patients under 16 years of age with complete prehospital, emergency department (ED), and in-patient data were identified in the 2007-2009 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). The COT outcomes and procedures were translated into ICD-9 procedure codes with added timing criteria. Gold standard triage levels were assigned using the COT based on outcomes, including mortality, injury type, admission to the hospital, and surgical procedures. Comparison triage levels were determined based on algorithmic depictions of the three MCI triage tools. RESULTS: A total of 31,093 patients with complete data were identified from the NTDB. The COT was applied to these patients, and the breakdown of gold standard triage levels, based on their actual clinical outcomes, was: 17,333 (55.7%) GREEN; 11,587 (37.3%) YELLOW; 1,572 (5.1%) RED; and 601 (1.9%) BLACK. CareFlight had the best sensitivity for predicting COT outcomes for BLACK (83% [95% confidence interval, 80%-86%]) and GREEN patients (79% [95% CI, 79%-80%]) and the best specificity for RED patients (89% [95% CI, 89%-90%]). CONCLUSION: Among three prehospital MCI triage tools, CareFlight had the best performance for correlating with outcomes in the COT. Overall, none of three tools had good test characteristics for predicting pediatric patient needs for surgical procedures or hospital admission.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Children · Mass casualty triage · Mortality & survival · Triage instruments
Related articles
- A procedure based alternative to the injury severity score for major incident triage of children: results of a Delphi consensus process. (Emerg Med J, 2006)
- Pediatric trauma triage: A Pediatric Trauma Society Research Committee systematic review. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2020)
- Comparative analysis of major incident triage tools in children: a UK population-based analysis. (Emerg Med J, 2021)
- Independent application of the Sacco Disaster Triage Method to pediatric trauma patients. (Prehosp Disaster Med, 2012)
- Trauma team activation for pediatric patients in Denmark: a multicenter study of criteria, organization, and injury severity. (Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2026)
- Comparison of prehospital professional accuracy, speed, and interrater reliability of six pediatric triage algorithms. (J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open, 2022)