Developing a national trauma research action plan: Results from the Burn Research Gap Delphi Survey.
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2021-09-24 · Method & validation
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 2016 National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine call for a national integrated, military-civilian trauma action plan to achieve zero preventable deaths and disability after injury included a proposal to establish a National Trauma Research Action Plan to "strengthen trauma research and ensure that the resources available for this research are commensurate with the importance of injury and the potential for improvement in patient outcomes." The Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma/burn care from prehospital to rehabilitation. The Burn/Reconstructive Surgery group represents one focus area for this research agenda development. METHODS: Experts in burn and reconstructive surgery research identified gaps in knowledge, generated research questions and prioritized questions using a consensus driven Delphi survey approach. Participants were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability with military and civilian representatives. Literature reviews informed the panel. Panelists were encouraged to use a PICO format to generate research questions: Patient/Population; Intervention; Compare/Control; Outcome. Participants ranked the priority of each question on a nine-point Likert scale, which was categorized to represent low, medium, and high priority items. Consensus was defined based on ≥60% panelist agreement. RESULTS: Subject matter experts generated 949 research questions in 29 Burn & 26 Reconstruction topics. Five hundred ninety-seven questions reached consensus. Of these, 338 (57%) were high-priority, 180 (30%), medium-priority, and 78 (13%) low-priority questions. CONCLUSION: Many high-priority questions translate to complex wound management and outcomes. Panel recognition that significant gaps in knowledge exist in understanding functional outcomes after injury underscores the importance of long-term recovery metrics even when studying acute injury or interventions such as resuscitation or inhalation injury. Funding agencies and burn/reconstructive surgery researchers should consider these gaps when they prioritize future research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Expert consensus, Level IV.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Military & tactical · Research methods & trial conduct
Related articles
- Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the trauma systems and informatics panel Delphi survey. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2023)
- Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the prehospital and mass casualty research Delphi survey. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2022)
- Research and conflict: mapping research trends and gaps in Ukrainian Emergency Medical Services- a scoping review. (Confl Health, 2025)
- Prehospital and emergency care research at the US Army Institute of Surgical Research: enabling the next great leap in combat casualty survival. (US Army Med Dep J, 2011)
- An Innovative Civilian Research Model to Inform Combat-Relevant Prolonged Casualty Care. (Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex), 2022)
- Bridging the Evidence-Practice Gap in Early Burn Injury Care: A Comprehensive Evidence Synthesis of Global Guidelines, Consensus, and Systematic Reviews for Resource-Limited Settings. (Eur Burn J, 2026)