How effective are chest compressions when wearing mask? A randomised simulation study among first-year health care students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
BMC Emergency Medicine · 2022-05-08 · Randomised trial
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The resuscitation guidelines provided for the COVID-19 pandemic strongly recommended wearing personal protective equipment. The current study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of chest compressions and the level of fatigue while wearing two different types of mask (surgical vs. cloth). METHODS: A randomized, non-inferiority, simulation study was conducted. Participants were randomised into two groups: surgical mask group (n = 108) and cloth mask group (n = 108). The effectiveness (depth and rate) of chest compressions was measured within a 2-min continuous chest-compression-only CPR session. Data were collected through an AMBU CPR Software, a questionnaire, recording vital parameters, and using Borg-scale related to fatigue (before and after the simulation). For further analysis the 2-min session was segmented into 30-s intervals. RESULTS: Two hundred sixteen first-year health care students participated in our study. No significant difference was measured between the surgical mask and cloth mask groups in chest compression depth (44.49 ± 10.03 mm vs. 45.77 ± 10.77 mm), rate (113.34 ± 17.76/min vs. 111.23 ± 17.51/min), and the level of fatigue (5.72 ± 1.69 vs. 5.56 ± 1.67) (p > 0.05 in every cases). Significant decrease was found in chest compression depth between the first 30-s interval and the second, third, and fourth intervals (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of chest compressions (depth and rate) was non-inferior when wearing cloth mask compared to wearing surgical mask. However, the effectiveness of chest compressions decreased significantly in both groups during the 2-min chest-compression-only CPR session and did not reach the appropriate chest compression depth range recommended by the ERC.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Related articles
- Chest compression quality comparing 1-min vs 2-min rotation of rescuers wearing N95 masks. (Am J Emerg Med, 2024)
- Resuscitation of the patient with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 when wearing personal protective equipment: A randomized multicenter crossover simulation trial. (Cardiol J, 2020)
- The efficacy of a smartwatch-based haptic metronome in standardising chest compression rate: a crossover simulation study. (Resusc Plus, 2026)
- The quality of CPR delivered by EMS personnel wearing enhanced personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study from Perth, Australia. (Resusc Plus, 2025)
- Impact of Virtual Interprofessional COVID-19 disaster simulation Tabletop Exercise (VICTEr) workshop on Disaster Preparedness among interprofessional trainees in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India (Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal, 2023)
- Reduced quality of life, more technical challenges, and less study motivation among paramedic students after one year of the COVID-19 pandemic - a survey study. (BMC Med Educ, 2023)