Implementation of the Modified Canadian C-Spine Rule by Paramedics.
Annals of Emergency Medicine · 2022-10-30 · Implementation & quality improvement
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The Canadian C-spine rule was modified and validated for use by the paramedics in a multicenter study where patients were assessed with the Canadian C-spine rule yet all transported with immobilization. This study evaluated the clinical impact of the modified Canadian C-spine rule when implemented by paramedics. METHODS: This single-center prospective cohort implementation study took place in Ottawa, Canada (from 2011 to 2015). Advanced and primary care paramedics were trained to use the modified Canadian C-spine rule, collect data on a standardized study form, and selectively transport eligible patients without immobilization. We evaluated all consecutive low-risk adult patients (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] 15, stable vital signs) at risk for a neck injury. We followed all patients without initial radiologic evaluation for 30 days. Analyses included descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CI), sensitivity, specificity, and kappa coefficients. RESULTS: The 4,034 enrolled patients had a mean age of 43 (range 16 to 99), and 53.4% were female. Motor vehicle collisions were the most common mechanism of injury (55.1%), followed by falls (23.9%). There were 11 clinically important injuries. The paramedics classified these injuries with a sensitivity of 90.9% (95% CI, 58.7 to 99.8) and specificity of 66.5% (95% CI, 65.1 to 68.0). There was no adverse event or resulting spinal cord injury. The kappa agreement between paramedics and investigators was 0.94. A total of 2,583 (64.0%) immobilizations were avoided using the modified Canadian C-spine rule. CONCLUSION: Paramedics could accurately apply the modified Canadian C-spine rule to low-risk trauma patients and significantly reduce the need for spinal immobilization during transport. This resulted in no adverse event or any spinal cord injury.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Critical care & advanced paramedics · Implementation · Paramedics & EMTs · Spinal motion restriction
Related articles
- Factors which affect the application and implementation of a spinal motion restriction protocol by prehospital providers in a low resource setting: A scoping review. (Afr J Emerg Med, 2022)
- Cluster-randomised-controlled trial evaluating the impact of implementing the Canadian C-Spine Rule in prehospital cervical spine trauma care by the French Emergency Medical Call Center: IPSTRAUC study - a protocol. (BMJ Open, 2026)
- Pragmatic Strategy Empowering Paramedics to Assess Low-Risk Trauma Patients With the Canadian C-Spine Rule and Selectively Transport Them Without Immobilization: Protocol for a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial. (JMIR Res Protoc, 2020)
- Value of prehospital assessment of spine fracture by paramedics. (Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2018)
- Prehospital clinical clearance of the cervical spine: a prospective study. (Am Surg, 2013)
- Evaluation of the safety of C-spine clearance by paramedics: design and methodology. (BMC Emerg Med, 2011)