Prehospital
Literature Index
Airway & ventilation

ETView SL versus Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation Amid Simulated COVID-19 Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Togay Evrin, Miroslaw Dabkowski, Michal Pruc, Jacek Hernik, Wojciech Wieczorek, Lukasz Chabowski, Pawel Wieczorek, Jaroslaw Chmielewski, Stepan Feduniw, Lukasz Szarpak

Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2023-08-02 · Randomised trial

Read at publisher · PubMed

Abstract

Airway management procedures, such as endotracheal intubation (ETI), pose a significant risk of aerosol generation, requiring robust personal protective equipment (PPE) against aerosol-generating procedures (AGP). This study aimed to assess the impact of PPE-AGP on intubation success rates, time to intubation, and glottic visualization using ETView and a standard Macintosh laryngoscope (MAC). A total of 52 physicians participated in this prospective, observational, randomized crossover study conducted in a medical simulation setting. Participants included COVID-19 patients with cardiac arrest scenarios with and without PPE-AGP who were intubated with ETView and MAC. During intubation without PPE-AGP, ETView showed a similar first-pass success rate (FPS) but had a shorter intubation time and better glottal hydration compared to MAC. In scenario B (with PPE-AGP), ETView outperformed MAC in FPS, initiation time, and glottic visualization. The use of PPE-AGP had little impact on ETView's performance. However, it negatively affected the Macintosh laryngoscope, reducing FPS and glottic visibility. Participants found intubation with ETView easier in both scenarios. In conclusion, as compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope, ETView demonstrated higher performance under the circumstances of the simulation, especially when PPE-AGP was used.

Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal

Tags

Personal protective equipment · Video laryngoscopy · Endotracheal intubation · COVID-19 pandemic

Related articles