The Certification Matters: A Comparative Performance Analysis of Combat Application Tourniquets versus Non-Certified CAT Look-Alike Tourniquets.
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine · 2023-08-01 · Method & validation
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Stop the Bleed campaign provided civilians with tourniquet application training and increased the demand for tourniquets among the general population, which led to the development of new commercially available devices. However, most widely available tourniquets have not undergone testing by regulatory bodies and their efficacy remains unknown. STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and performance of Combat Application Tourniquets (CAT) versus uncertified tourniquets. METHODS: This study compared 25 CAT with 50 commercially available "look-alike" tourniquets (LA-TQ) resembling the CAT. The CAT and the LA-TQ were compared for cost, size, and tested during one-hour and six-hour applications on a manikin's leg. The outcomes were force applied, force variation during the application, and tourniquet rupture rate. RESULTS: The LA-TQ were cheaper (US$6.07 versus US$27.19), shorter, and had higher inter-device variability than the CAT (90.1 [SE = 0.5] cm versus 94.5 [SE = 0.1] cm; P <.001). The CAT applied a significantly greater force during the initial application when compared to the LA-TQ (65 [SE = 3] N versus 14 [SE = 1] N; P <.001). While the initial application force was maintained for up to six hours in both groups, the CAT group applied an increased force during one-hour applications (group effect: F [1,73] = 105.65; P <.001) and during six-hour applications (group effect: F [1,12] = 9.79; P = .009). The rupture rate differed between the CAT and the LA-TQ (0% versus 4%). CONCLUSION: The LA-TQ applied a significantly lower force and had a higher rupture rate compared to the CAT, potentially affecting tourniquet performance in the context of public bleeding control. These findings warrant increased layperson education within the framework of the Stop the Bleed campaign and further investigations on the effectiveness of uncertified devices in real-world applications.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Related articles
- A comparison study between the Hemorrhage-Arresting Lever-Operated (HALO) tourniquet and the Combat Action Tourniquet (CAT) for the management of exsanguinating extremity hemorrhage. (Am J Disaster Med, 2024)
- Blood Vessel Occlusion by the Layperson Audiovisual Assist Tourniquet (LAVA TQ) Compared to the Combat Application Tourniquet: Randomized Controlled Trial. (West J Emerg Med, 2023)
- Efficacy of the Military Tactical Emergency Tourniquet for Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusion Compared with the Combat Application Tourniquet: A Randomized Crossover Study. (J Spec Oper Med, 2023)
- Combat lifesaver-trained, first-responder application of junctional tourniquets: a prospective, randomized, crossover trial. (Mil Med Res, 2018)
- Short Report Comparing Generation 6 Versus Prototype Generation 7 Combat Application Tourniquet® in a Manikin Hemorrhage Model. (J Spec Oper Med, 2016)
- High Tourniquet Failure Rates Among Non-Medical Personnel Do Not Improve with Tourniquet Training, Including Combat Stress Inoculation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (Prehosp Disaster Med, 2019)