Indicators for the evaluation of musculoskeletal trauma systems: A scoping review and Delphi study.
PLoS ONE · 2023-01-01 · Method & validation
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trauma is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries. Musculoskeletal trauma results in the majority of post-traumatic morbidity and disability globally. The literature has reported many performance indicators relating to trauma care, but few specific to musculoskeletal injuries. STUDY OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish a practical list of performance indicators to evaluate and monitor the quality and equity of musculoskeletal trauma care delivery in health systems worldwide. METHODS: A scoping review was performed that identified performance indicators related to musculoskeletal trauma care. Indicators were organized by phase of care (general, prevention, pre-hospital, hospital, post-hospital) within a modified Donabedian model (structure, process, outcome, equity). A panel of 21 experts representing 45 countries was assembled to identify priority indicators utilizing a modified Delphi approach. RESULTS: The scoping review identified 1,206 articles and 114 underwent full text review. We included 95 articles which reported 498 unique performance indicators. Most indicators related to the hospital phase of care (n = 303, 60%) and structural characteristics (n = 221, 44%). Mortality (n = 50 articles) and presence of trauma registries (n = 16 articles) were the most frequently reported indicators. After 3 rounds of surveys our panel reached consensus on a parsimonious list of priority performance indicators. These focused on access to trauma care; processes and key resources for polytrauma triage, patient stabilization, and hemorrhage control; reduction and immobilization of fractures and dislocations; and management of compartment syndrome and open fractures. CONCLUSIONS: The literature has reported many performance indicators relating to trauma care, but few specific to musculoskeletal injuries. To create quality and equitable trauma systems, musculoskeletal care must be incorporated into development plans with continuous monitoring and improvement. The performance indicators identified by our expert panel and organized in a modified Donabedian model can serve as a method for evaluating musculoskeletal trauma care.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Equity & disparities · Implementation · Low- and middle-income settings
Related articles
- The application of focused assessment with sonography for trauma in resource-limited settings: a scoping review. (Front Public Health, 2026)
- Improvements in prehospital trauma care in an African country with no formal emergency medical services. (J Trauma, 2002)
- Analysing geospatial variables in the context of trauma networks: A scoping review. (Injury, 2026)
- Effectiveness of Standardized Nurse-Led Triage Protocols in Improving Outcomes, Timeliness, and Accuracy in Road Traffic and Trauma Care in Low-Resource Settings: A Systematic Review. (J Multidiscip Healthc, 2026)
- Digital Health Intervention in Snakebite Management: Scoping Review. (J Med Internet Res, 2025)
- Organised trauma systems and designated trauma centres for improving outcomes in injured patients. (Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2025)