Use of Low-Titer O-Positive Whole Blood in Female Trauma Patients: A Literature Review, Qualitative Multidisciplinary Analysis of Risk/Benefit, and Guidelines for Its Use as a Universal Product in Hemorrhagic Shock.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2023-11-06 · Guideline / consensus
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whole blood transfusion is associated with benefits including improved survival, coagulopathy, and decreased transfusion requirements. The majority of whole blood transfusion is in the form of low-titer O-positive whole blood (LTOWB). Practice at many trauma centers withholds the use of LTOWB in women of childbearing potential due to concerns of alloimmunization. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence for LTOWB transfusion in female trauma patients and generate guidelines for its application. STUDY DESIGN: Literature and evidence for LTOWB transfusion in hemorrhagic shock are reviewed. The rates of alloimmunization and subsequent obstetrical outcomes are compared to the reported outcomes of LTOWB vs other resuscitation media. Literature regarding patient experiences and preferences in regards to the risk of alloimmunization is compared to current trauma practices. RESULTS: LTOWB has shown improved outcomes in both military and civilian settings. The overall risk of alloimmunization for Rhesus factor (Rh) - female patients in hemorrhagic shock exposed to Rh + blood is low (3% to 20%). Fetal outcomes in Rh-sensitized patients are excellent compared to historical standards, and treatment options continue to expand. The majority of female patients surveyed on the risk of alloimmunization favor receiving Rh + blood products to improve trauma outcomes. Obstetrical transfusion practices have incorporated LTOWB with excellent results. CONCLUSIONS: The use of whole blood resuscitation in trauma is associated with benefits in the resuscitation of severely injured patients. The rate at which severely injured, Rh-negative patients develop anti-D antibodies is low. Treatments for alloimmunized pregnancies have advanced, with excellent results. Fears of alloimmunization in female patients are likely overstated and may not warrant the withholding of whole blood resuscitation. The benefits of whole blood resuscitation likely outweigh the risks of alloimmunization.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Blood products · Fluids & blood · Military & tactical · Mortality & survival · Pregnant patients
Related articles
- Whole-Blood vs Component Therapy in Adult Trauma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (JAMA Surg, 2026)
- Whole blood transfusion in the treatment of acute hemorrhage, a systematic review and meta-analysis. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2023)
- Prehospital Blood Product Resuscitation for Trauma: A Systematic Review. (Shock, 2016)
- What is the impact of prehospital blood product administration for patients with catastrophic haemorrhage: an integrative review. (Injury, 2019)
- Utility and outcomes of prehospital vasopressors infusion in trauma patients: a systematic review. (Eur J Emerg Med, 2026)
- Whole Blood Administration for Obstetric-Related Hemorrhage During Prehospital Transport. (Obstet Gynecol, 2023)