Ambulance personnel use of coercion and use of safety belts in Norway.
BMC Health Services Research · 2023-11-27 · Observational study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Providing health care in a moving vehicle requires different considerations regarding safety than in other settings. Use of seatbelts are mandatory, and during ambulance transport patients are fastened to the stretcher with safety straps. However, patients who wriggle out of, or unfasten, their safety straps pose a threat to him/herself and escorting personnel in the ambulance compartment in case of an accident. To prevent harm, ambulance personnel sometimes restrain the patient or unfasten their own seatbelts to keep the patient safe on the stretcher. The prevalence of coercive measures, and the relationship between the use of mechanical restraints comparable to coercion and seatbelt use, are scarcely investigated. Use of coercion normally requires a specific statutory basis. However, coercive measures needed to ensure safety in a moving vehicle while providing healthcare is hardly discussed in the literature. The aim of this study is to explore the use of coercion in ambulance services, the use of safety belts among escorts in situations where they need to keep the patient calm during transportation, and to analyse the relationship between safety belt non-compliance and coercion in these situations. METHODS: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study using a self-administered, online survey aiming to investigate the use of coercion and use of seatbelts during ambulance transport. Approximately 3,400 ambulance personnel from all 18 Health Trusts in Norway were invited to participate between Oct 2021 and Nov 2022. Descriptive analyses were used to describe the sample and the prevalence of findings, while multiple linear regressions were used to investigate associations. RESULTS: Altogether, 681 (20%) ambulance personnel completed the survey where 488 (72.4%) stated that they had used coercion during the last six months and 375 (55.7%) had experienced ambulance personnel or escorting personnel working with unfastened seatbelts during transport. The majority of respondents experienced coercion as being unpleasant and more negative feelings were associated with less use of seatbelts. CONCLUSIONS: Coercion seems to be used by ambulance personnel frequently. For the study participants, keeping the patient securely fastened was prioritized above escorting personnel's traffic safety, despite feeling uncomfortable doing so. Because coercive measures have negative consequences for patients, is associated with negative feelings for health personnel, and is not discussed ethically and legally in relation to the prehospital context, there is an urgent need for more research on the topic, and for legal preparatory work to address the unique perspectives of the prehospital context in which traffic safety also is an important factor.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Ambulance vehicle & crash safety · Ethics · Clinician perspective
Related articles
- Evaluation of safety, comfort, and design ergonomics in ambulance retrieval vehicles: a survey in Southern India. (Int J Emerg Med, 2026)
- Caring for patients at high speed. (Emerg Nurse, 2013)
- A National Assessment of the Health and Safety of Emergency Medical Services Professionals. (Prehosp Disaster Med, 2016)
- Understanding emergency workers' behavior and perspectives on design and safety in the workplace. (Appl Ergon, 2017)
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and back injury in ambulance officers. (Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 2005)
- How prehospital emergency personnel manage ethical challenges: the importance of confidence, trust, and safety. (BMC Med Ethics, 2024)