When Minutes Matter: A Comparison of Whole Blood Collection Techniques.
Journal of Special Operations Medicine · 2024-03-01 · Observational study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fast and reliable blood collection is critical to emergency walking blood banks (WBB) because mortality significantly declines when blood is quickly administered to a warfighter with hemorrhagic shock. Phlebotomy for WBB is accomplished via either the "straight stick" (SS) or "ruggedized lock" (RL) method. SS comprises a 16-gauge phlebotomy needle connected to a blood collection bag via tubing. The RL device collects blood through the same apparatus, but has a capped, intravenous (IV) catheter between the needle and the donor's arm. This is the first study to compare these two methods in battlefield-relevant metrics. METHODS: Military first responders and licensed medical providers (N=86) were trained in SS and RL as part of fresh whole blood training exercises. Outcomes included venipuncture success rates, time to IV access, blood collection times, total time, and user preferences, using a within-subjects crossover design. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and nonparametric statistics at p<0.05. RESULTS: SS outperformed RL in first venipuncture success rates (76% vs. 64%, p=0.07), IV access times (448 [standard error of the mean; SE 23] vs. 558 [SE 31] s, p<0.01), and blood collection bag fill times (573 [SE 48] vs. 703 [SE 44] s, p<0.05), resulting in an approximate 3.5-minute faster time overall. Survey data were mixed, with users perceiving SS as simpler and faster, but RL as more reliable and secure. CONCLUSION: SS is optimal when timely collection is imperative, while RL may be preferable when device stability or replacing the collection bag is a consideration.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Blood products · Fluids & blood · Military & tactical · Time intervals
Related articles
- Early, Prehospital Activation of the Walking Blood Bank Based on Mechanism of Injury Improves Time to Fresh Whole Blood Transfusion. (J Spec Oper Med, 2016)
- Improving the Emergency Whole Blood Program. (Mil Med, 2011)
- The effect of prehospital transport time, injury severity, and blood transfusion on survival of US military casualties in Iraq. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2018)
- Association of Prehospital Blood Product Transfusion During Medical Evacuation of Combat Casualties in Afghanistan With Acute and 30-Day Survival. (JAMA, 2017)
- Transport Time and Preoperating Room Hemostatic Interventions Are Important: Improving Outcomes After Severe Truncal Injury. (Crit Care Med, 2018)
- Resuscitative thoracotomy in modern warfare: Experience from a Military-Civilian trauma system. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2026)