Advanced paramedics' restraint decision-making when managing acute behavioural disturbance (ABD) in the UK pre-hospital ambulance setting: A qualitative investigation.
PLoS ONE · 2024-01-01 · Qualitative study
Abstract
Acute behavioural disturbance (ABD), sometimes called 'excited delirium', is a medical emergency. In the UK, some patients presenting with ABD are managed by advanced paramedics (APs), however little is known about how APs make restraint decisions. The aim of this research is to explore the decisions made by APs when managing restraint in the context of ABD, in the UK pre-hospital ambulance setting. Seven semi-structured interviews were undertaken with APs. All participants were experienced APs with post-registration, post-graduate advanced practice education and qualifications. The resulting data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, informed by critical realism. We identified four interconnected themes from the interview data. Firstly, managing complexity and ambiguity in relation to identifying ABD patients and determining appropriate treatment plans. Secondly, feeling vulnerable to professional consequences from patients deteriorating whilst in the care of APs. Thirdly, negotiating with other professionals who have different roles and priorities. Finally, establishing primacy of care in relation to incidents which involve police officers and other professionals. A key influence was the need to characterise incidents as medical, as an enabler to establishing clinical leadership and decision-making control. APs focused on de-escalation techniques and sought to reduce physical restraint, intervening with pharmacological interventions if necessary to achieve this. The social relationships and interactions with patients and other professionals at the scene were key to success. Decisions are a source of anxiety, with fears of professional detriment accompanying poor patient outcomes. Our results indicate that APs would benefit from education and development specifically in relation to making ABD decisions, acknowledging the context of inter-professional relationships and the potential for competing and conflicting priorities. A focus on joint, high-fidelity training with the police may be a helpful intervention.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Critical care & advanced paramedics · Fire service & police · Interagency collaboration · Clinician perspective · Teamwork & human factors
Related articles
- Consensus Statement of the National Association of EMS Physicians International Association of Fire Chiefs and the International Association of Chiefs of Police: Best Practices for Collaboration Between Law Enforcement and Emergency Medical Services During Acute Behavioral Emergencies. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2024)
- Development of aggressive patient management skills among pre-hospital emergency health workers (International Journal of Emergency Services, 2025)
- Firefighters and police search dog handlers' experiences working closely with paramedics in urban search and rescue incidents: a qualitative focus group study from Oslo. (Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2024)
- Police and mental health clinician partnership in response to mental health crisis: A qualitative study. (Int J Ment Health Nurs, 2015)
- Emergency workers' experiences of the use of section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983: interpretative phenomenological investigation. (BJPsych Bull, 2020)
- First responders' experiences with major earthquakes in Türkiye: a qualitative study of innovation needs and challenges. (BMC Emerg Med, 2025)