Parallel activation of helicopter and ground transportation after dispatcher identification of suspected anterior large vessel occlusion stroke in rural areas: a proof-of-concept case with modeling from the LESTOR trial.
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · 2024-07-06 · Method & validation
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When stroke patients with suspected anterior large vessel occlusion (aLVO) happen to live in rural areas, two main options exist for prehospital transport: (i) the drip-and-ship (DnS) strategy, which ensures rapid access to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) at the nearest primary stroke center but requires time-consuming interhospital transfer for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) because the latter is only available at comprehensive stroke centers (CSC); and (ii) the mothership (MS) strategy, which entails direct transport to a CSC and allows for faster access to EVT but carries the risk of IVT being delayed or even the time window being missed completely. The use of a helicopter might shorten the transport time to the CSC in rural areas. However, if the aLVO stroke is only recognized by the emergency service on site, the helicopter must be requested in addition, which extends the prehospital time and partially negates the time advantage. We hypothesized that parallel activation of ground and helicopter transportation in case of aLVO suspicion by the dispatcher (aLVO-guided dispatch strategy) could shorten the prehospital time in rural areas and enable faster treatment with IVT and EVT. METHODS: As a proof-of-concept, we report a case from the LESTOR trial where the dispatcher suspected an aLVO stroke during the emergency call and dispatched EMS and HEMS in parallel. Based on this case, we compare the provided aLVO-guided dispatch strategy to the DnS and MS strategies regarding the times to IVT and EVT using a highly realistic modeling approach. RESULTS: With the aLVO-guided dispatch strategy, the patient received IVT and EVT faster than with the DnS or MS strategies. IVT was administered 6 min faster than in the DnS strategy and 22 min faster than in the MS strategy, and EVT was started 47 min earlier than in the DnS strategy and 22 min earlier than in the MS strategy. CONCLUSION: In rural areas, parallel activation of ground and helicopter emergency services following dispatcher identification of stroke patients with suspected aLVO could provide rapid access to both IVT and EVT, thereby overcoming the limitations of the DnS and MS strategies.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Helicopter & air ambulance · Antithrombotics & thrombolytics · Dispatchers & call takers · Interfacility & critical care transport · Rural & remote · Thrombolytics · Time intervals
Related articles
- Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Air Versus Ground Interhospital Transport in a Rural Area: A Retrospective Comparative Study. (J Korean Med Sci, 2025)
- Safety and Time Course of Drip-and-Ship in Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. (J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2017)
- Toward Inter-isolated Island Cooperation for the Drip, Ship, and Retrieve Method in the Sakishima Islands: A Case Report. (J Neuroendovasc Ther, 2020)
- Centralised Management System and Hot Transfer for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Western NSW: Closing the Gap in Current Models of Rural ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care. (Heart Lung Circ, 2025)
- [Management of patients with STEMI transported with air-ambulance to Landspitali University Hospital in Reykjavík]. (Laeknabladid, 2010)
- Identification of Anterior Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke During the Emergency Call: Protocol for a Controlled, Nonrandomized Trial. (JMIR Res Protoc, 2024)