The use of a pre-hospital questionnaire expedited the acute management of patients with ischemic stroke in a comprehensive stroke center.
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · 2024-07-09 · Observational study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delays in intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) treatment for acute ischemic stroke decrease the benefit of treatment. Difficulties determining a patient's clinical eligibility for IVT is a frequent cause of treatment delays. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the "PROVIDENCE" datasheet, a pre- hospital assessment of contraindications for IVT use applied by emergency medical services personnel. METHODS: We performed a single-center cohort study comparing IVT decision and treatment times between patients with PROVIDENCE datasheets and those without. Patients were eligible if they were over 18 years old and presented to our comprehensive stroke center from the field with stroke-like symptoms with onset within 4.5 hours. RESULTS: We identified 465 records and included 166 records in our final analysis (54 in the study group and 112 in the control group). A subgroup of 85 patients received IVT (30 in the study group patients and 55 in the control group). The PROVIDENCE datasheet was associated with a faster median time by five minutes from the patient's initial presentation at the emergency department to the final decision regarding IVT eligibility (p = 0.032) and a faster time between the first encounter with a neurology provider and the decision regarding IVT administration by six minutes (p = 0.002) for the entire sample. In the subgroup that received IVT, the PROVIDENCE datasheet decreased the median decision time by seven minutes (p = 0.044) There was no significant difference in door-to-needle times between groups. CONCLUSION: Using the PROVIDENCE datasheet, first responders can quickly identify potential contraindications for IVT treatment in patients with stroke-like symptoms. This tool expedited decision-making and led to faster IVT administration process at a comprehensive stroke center.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Antithrombotics & thrombolytics · Decision support tools · Thrombolytics · Time intervals
Related articles
- Care Strategies in Emergency Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review. (Neurol Int, 2026)
- Assessing the impact of emergency medicine pharmacists on fibrinolytic door-to-needle times in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis (Pharmacist-assisted Stroke Treatments I (PhAST-1)). (Am J Emerg Med, 2025)
- Effectiveness of mobile stroke units in reducing time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a scoping review. (Int J Emerg Med, 2025)
- Golden Hour Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (Ann Neurol, 2024)
- Mobile Stroke Units in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 5 "T Letter" Domains. (Cardiol Rev, 2024)
- Is telestroke more effective than conventional treatment for acute ischemic stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient outcomes and thrombolysis rates. (Int J Stroke, 2024)