The time-dependent yield of invasive vs. standard resuscitation strategies: A secondary analysis of the Prague out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study.
Resuscitation · 2024-08-02 · Observational study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is unclear how invasive resuscitative protocols may impact the time-dependent prognosis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitations, or the relationship between intra-arrest transport and outcomes. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the Prague OHCA Study, which randomized refractory OHCAs to "invasive" (intra-arrest transport for possible ECPR initiation) vs. "standard" resuscitation strategies (predominantly performed on-scene). Between groups, we compared outcomes of the initial resuscitation and 180- and 30-day favourable neurological outcomes (CPC 1-2), and within categories based on resuscitation duration (collapse-to-ROSC/ECPR interval). We plotted the dynamic probability of favourable outcomes with increasing durations of unsuccessful resuscitation. RESULTS: Among invasive and standard groups, respectively: 34/124 (27%) vs. 58/132 (44%) had sustained ROSC (difference -17%, 95%CI -5.0, -28); 38/124 (31%) vs. 24/132 (18%) had 30-day favourable neurological outcomes (difference 12%; 95%CI 2.0, 23); and 39/124 (31%) vs. 29/132 (22%) had 180-day favourable neurological outcomes (difference 9.5%; 95%CI -1.3, 20). For favourable outcome cases: standard group resuscitation durations were right-skewed within the first 60 min; for the invasive group the distribution was bimodal, extending to 77 min. For invasive- and standard-treated cases, the probability of favourable outcomes among those in refractory arrest at 30 min was 28% and 7.6%, respectively; declining to 0% at 77 and 60 min. CONCLUSION: In comparison to standard resuscitation, invasive strategy cases had fewer achieve sustained ROSC, however improved overall 30-day favourable neurological outcomes. While standard resuscitation yield was limited to < 60 min, invasive protocols offer a second extended window of potential successful resuscitation.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
ECMO & mechanical circulatory support · Mortality & survival · Quality of life & function · Time intervals
Related articles
- Intraarrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and early invasive management in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an individual patient data pooled analysis of two randomised trials. (EClinicalMedicine, 2023)
- Extracorporeal and Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Low-Flow Duration: Insights From a Nationwide Hospital-Based Registry Study in Japan (JAAM-OHCA Registry). (J Am Heart Assoc, 2025)
- Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and immediate invasive assessment in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a long-term follow-up of the Prague OHCA trial. (Crit Care, 2024)
- Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: 10-year experience in a metropolitan cardiac arrest centre in Milan, Italy. (Resusc Plus, 2024)
- Prognostic Impact of No-Flow Time on 30-Day Neurological Outcomes in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Who Received Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. (Circ J, 2020)
- Exploratory Observational Study of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Nonshockable Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Occurring After an Emergency Medical Services Arrival: SOS-KANTO 2012 Study Report. (J Emerg Med, 2020)