Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Critical Care Medicine · 2024-11-21 · Meta-analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of ketamine and etomidate as induction agents to facilitate emergent endotracheal intubation. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to April 3, 2024. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ketamine to etomidate to facilitate emergent endotracheal intubation in adults. DATA EXTRACTION: Reviewers screened abstracts, full texts, and extracted data independently and in duplicate. We pooled data using a random-effects model, assessed risk of bias using the modified Cochrane tool and certainty of evidence using the Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We pre-registered the protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42023472450). DATA SYNTHESIS: We included seven RCTs ( n = 2384 patients). Based on pooled analysis, compared with etomidate, ketamine probably increases hemodynamic instability in the peri-intubation period (relative risk [RR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.57; moderate certainty) but probably decreases the need for initiation of continuous infusion vasopressors (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-1.00; moderate certainty) and results in less adrenal suppression (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.45-0.66; moderate certainty). Ketamine probably has no effect on successful intubation on the first attempt (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.97-1.05; moderate certainty) or organ dysfunction measured as the maximum Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score during the first 3 days in ICU (mean difference, 0.55 SOFA points lower; 95% CI, 1.12 lower to 0.03 higher; moderate certainty) and may have no effect on mortality (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83-1.21; low certainty) when compared with etomidate. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with etomidate, ketamine probably results in more hemodynamic instability during the peri-intubation period and appears to have no effect on successful intubation on the first attempt or mortality. However, ketamine results in decreased need for the initiation of vasopressor use and decreases adrenal suppression compared with etomidate.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Anaesthetics · Cardiovascular drugs · Etomidate · Ketamine · Rapid sequence intubation · Vasopressors
Related articles
- Clinical outcomes after a single induction dose of etomidate versus ketamine for emergency department sepsis intubation: a randomized controlled trial. (Sci Rep, 2023)
- Emergency department airway management-2026: EMAT clinical policy guideline. (Turk J Emerg Med, 2026)
- Ketamine versus Etomidate as an induction agent for tracheal intubation: An updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. (Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 2026)
- Induction agents for emergency tracheal intubation in critically ill adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. (Crit Care, 2026)
- Ketamine for rapid sequence intubation in adult trauma patients: A retrospective observational study. (Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2020)
- Ketamine/propofol admixture vs etomidate for intubation in the critically ill: KEEP PACE Randomized clinical trial. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2019)