How Performing Chest Compressions Influences Mental Arithmetic Capabilities: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial.
Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2025-05-12 · Randomised trial
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is cognitively demanding, often requiring helpers to perform cognitive and manual tasks simultaneously. While the human brain primarily switches between tasks rather than processing them simultaneously, it remains unclear whether performing repetitive, monotonous manual tasks, such as chest compressions, affects cognitive performance. This study aimed to assess the impact of chest compressions on mental arithmetic performance. Methods: In a randomized crossover trial, healthy participants trained in advanced life support (physicians, nurses, and paramedics) completed the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) under two conditions: with or without performing chest compressions on a manikin. The primary outcome was the number of correct PASAT answers. Secondary outcomes included workload assessment using the NASA Task Load Index (TLX) and chest compression (CC) performance. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov and approved by the local ethics committee. Results: Thirty-eight participants were included. The number of correct PASAT responses was significantly lower during chest compressions compared to the control (36.5 vs. 41; p < 0.01). NASA TLX values were significantly higher in the chest compression condition, indicating increased perceived workload. Chest compression performance showed statistically significant differences between a phase of just chest compressions and during the PASAT, especially increased levels of incomplete recoil. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that even a simple repetitive motor task like chest compressions impairs cognitive task performance significantly. Furthermore, multitasking was shown to decrease chest compression quality. These findings strongly highlight the importance of effective task allocation and minimizing multitasking during CPR to optimize performance and thereby patient outcomes.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Paramedics & EMTs · Teamwork & human factors
Related articles
- Effect on Chest Compression Fraction of Continuous Manual Compressions with Asynchronous Ventilations Using an i-gel® versus 30:2 Approach during Simulated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Protocol for a Manikin Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. (Healthcare (Basel), 2021)
- Mechanical LUCAS resuscitation is effective, reduces physical workload and improves mental performance of helicopter teams. (Minerva Anestesiol, 2016)
- Effect of socioemotional stress on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during advanced life support in a randomized manikin study. (Crit Care Med, 2011)
- Objective performance of emergency medical technicians in the use of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with subjective self-evaluation: a cross-sectional, simulation-based study. (BMJ Open, 2022)
- Optimal paramedic numbers in resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized controlled study in a simulation setting. (PLoS One, 2020)
- Association Between the Number of Emergency Medical Services and the Chest Compression Quality in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. (J Emerg Med, 2025)