Examining air medical transport in interfacility emergency general surgery transfers to a quaternary center.
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2025-06-11 · Observational study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regionalized care has increased interfacility transfers, particularly for emergency general surgery (EGS) patients requiring urgent, specialized care. Air medical transport (AMT) provides rapid transfer with critical care capabilities and is increasingly used for EGS, but its time-saving benefits remain uncertain. This study aims to identify the population of EGS patients undergoing AMT and the distance thresholds where AMT is faster than ground transport. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort and analyzed EGS patients transferred to our quaternary center from January 2021 to December 2023. Geospatial analysis was used to calculate transport distances, and linear regression assessed the association between transfer time and distance, identifying the threshold where the 95% confidence interval of AMT no longer overlapped with ground transport. We stratified the analysis by weather conditions and peak traffic times. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,713 EGS patients, with 26.4% undergoing AMT. Air medical transport patients were older and more frail and had higher in-hospital mortality rates (27.9% vs. 7.2%) compared with ground transport patients. The most common primary diagnosis for was unspecified sepsis, but AMT patients had more necrotizing soft tissue infections and gastrointestinal bleeds. Air medical transport became faster than ground transport at a threshold of 5.7 miles, increasing to 7.2 miles during adverse weather and 9.1 miles during peak traffic. A random-forest model identified peak traffic and patient sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score as key factors influencing AMT use. Sensitivity analyses showed that including transport priority and year as interaction terms increased the distance thresholds to 17.4 miles and above. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to examine AMT practice patterns in EGS and quantify distance thresholds for transport efficiency. Total transfer time and choice of transport mode are significantly influenced by weather conditions and peak traffic, highlighting the need data-driven triage protocols. Such protocols will improve timely decision making and optimize patient transfers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level IV.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Helicopter & air ambulance · Interfacility & critical care transport · Mortality & survival · Older adults · Time intervals
Related articles
- Cardiac Arrest During Interfacility Transport with Emergency Medical Services: A Preliminary Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2026)
- The Role of Integrated Air Transport System in Managing Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture. (Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2024)
- Comparison of Interfacility Transfer of Critically Ill Pediatric Patients by Helicopter Versus Ground Ambulance in a Remote and Rural Domain. (Air Med J, 2024)
- Helicopter Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department: Demographic and Clinical Factors Impacting Outcomes in a Turkish Medical Center. (Med Sci Monit, 2023)
- Comparison of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Transport Types and Delays on Patient Outcomes at Two Level I Trauma Centers. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2017)
- When birds can't fly: an analysis of interfacility ground transport using advanced life support when helicopter emergency medical service is unavailable. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2014)