Influence of smartphone-based first aid systems on the outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Minerva Anestesiologica · 2025-05-01 · Observational study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the impact of Smartphone-based-first responder-systems (SFRS) such as "Mobile Retter" on relevant clinical endpoints in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: Rescue service data from the district of Guetersloh between 2013 and 2023 were categorized into four groups based on the initiator of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): lay bystanders with (LB-Tel) and without telephone guidance from the rescue service control center (LB-no-Tel), community first responders (CFR) and emergency medical services (EMS). The results were analyzed using a propensity score analysis with overlap weighting. RESULTS: Overall, 1,620 resuscitations (LB-Tel: N.=493(30.4%); LB-no-Tel: N.=341(21.0%); CFR: N.=187(11.5%); EMS: N.=599(37.0%)) were analyzed. Compared to EMS, the emergency response time (ERT) of CFR was significantly shorter (95%CI: -2.01- -0.89). Regarding achieving a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and a good neurological outcome (OUT), there was no evidence of a difference between CFR and EMS (ROSC:odds ratio (OR):0.90;95%CI:0.56-1.45; OUT: OR:1.04;95%CI:0.42-2.54). However, when comparing CFR with LB-Tel showed a clinically relevant tendency for a favorable effect in relation to ROSC for CFR (ROSC: OR:1.17; 95%CI:0.72-1.92). In contrast, the group of CFR showed a lower chance of achieving a ROSC compared to LB-no-Tel (ROSC: OR:0.86;95%CI:0.51-1.46). CONCLUSIONS: SFRS significantly reduce ERT compared to EMS, but our study was unable to provide evidence of a higher chance of ROSC or a good neurological outcome. To improve the outcome after OHCA, public training in resuscitation measures should be intensified, and the network of CFR should be expanded.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Alerted volunteer responders · Bystanders · Mortality & survival · Quality of life & function · Time intervals
Related articles
- Cumulative effect of public health interventions on time interval to first chest compression and survival outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. (Resuscitation, 2025)
- Mobile applications enhance out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (BMC Health Serv Res, 2025)
- Comparison of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests during the COVID-19 pandemic with those before the pandemic: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. (Front Public Health, 2023)
- Dispatching citizens as first responders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Eur J Emerg Med, 2022)
- Time to Return of Spontaneous Circulation and Long-Term Outcomes in Bystander-Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survivors. (Resuscitation, 2026)
- Regional deprivation and out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest outcomes: Moderated mediation by call‐to‐emergency department time and bystander resuscitation (Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2026)