Success of airway management in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using different devices - a prospective, single-center, observational study comparing professions.
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · 2025-06-23 · Observational study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation is the gold standard for airway management in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) but requires practice, especially in difficult conditions. To facilitate this, video laryngoscopy (VL) is increasingly used. The extent to which it is actually used in practice by paramedics or emergency physicians (EPs) and its effectiveness remain unclear. This prospective observational study investigates these aspects. METHODS: From January 2020 to June 2024, we surveyed emergency physicians and paramedics in a German county about out-of-hospital resuscitations. The questionnaire covered qualifications, airway devices, attempts, and complications. Data was analyzed descriptively and statistically. The significance level was set at alpha ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: 301 questionnaires were analyzed, with an overall first pass success (FPS) rate of 62.8%. No significant difference was found between direct laryngoscopy (DL) and video laryngoscopy (VL), though VL with McGrath performed worse than DL and VL with C-Mac. FPS rates did not differ significantly between emergency physicians and paramedics. Both achieved better results with their regularly used device. Paramedics used laryngeal masks more frequently (34% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001). Among emergency physicians, anesthetists had the lowest FPS using DL (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: The FPS rate did not differ between DL and VL but was low overall. This low rate, as well as the fact that emergency physicians and paramedics achieved comparable results in intubation, might indicate an increased need for training and further education in the area of airway management for emergency personnel. However, it can also be questioned to what extent ETI can be recommended at all, with supraglottic devices being an alternative. A possible benefit of more training can be seen in the higher success rates with the more frequently used devices in both professions. An uncertainty of paramedics regarding endotracheal intubation is also reflected in an more frequent use of laryngeal masks. The fact that internists who used VL more frequently had better FPS rates than anesthetists who intubated conventionally more often shows the potential of VL, especially under difficult out-of-hospital intubation conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS ID: DRKS00021821, 12.06.2020).
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Endotracheal intubation · Paramedics & EMTs · Prehospital physicians · Supraglottic airway · Video laryngoscopy
Related articles
- Comparison of airway management techniques for different access in a simulated motor vehicle entrapment scenario. (Eur J Emerg Med, 2016)
- Impact of COVID-19-adapted guidelines using different airway management strategies on resuscitation quality in out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest - a randomised manikin study. (BMC Emerg Med, 2023)
- Using supraglottic airways by paramedics for airway management in analogue microgravity increases speed and success of ventilation. (Sci Rep, 2021)
- A comparison of airway management devices in simulated entrapment-trauma: a prospective manikin study. (Int J Emerg Med, 2019)
- Advanced Airway Type and Its Association with Chest Compression Interruptions During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Attempts. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2017)
- Comparison of success rates between two video laryngoscope systems used in a prehospital clinical trial. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2014)