Casualty care in a low-resource conflict setting: injury epidemiology and management among military personnel in Burkina Faso from 2020 to 2024.
BMJ Military Health · 2025-07-30 · Observational study
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Sahel region of Africa has been increasingly affected by terrorist groups; however, little international attention has been received. To address the lack of data on local casualty care in the Sahel, we conducted an analysis of casualties treated at a military hospital in Burkina Faso. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of casualties treated at the largest military hospital in Burkina Faso between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2024 was conducted. Study participants included military personnel and 'country defence volunteers' with injuries sustained during military and antiterrorism operations. Data were obtained from paper records, including patient charts, hospital registration, anaesthesia logs and operative reports. We analysed injury epidemiology, care processes and early outcomes, then compared these to findings from US casualties during operation enduring freedom (OEF) in Afghanistan. RESULTS: Of 1392 casualties with conflict-related injuries managed during the study period, the majority (99.7%) were male with a mean age of 29.0 years. Less than 1% (0.2%) arrived within 1-hour postinjury, compared with 65.8% of OEF casualties. The majority (62.8%, n=874) arrived between 12 and 24 hours postinjury. Injury mechanisms included gunshot wound (67.9%, n=945), improvised explosive devices (20.9%, n=291), other explosives (5.0%, n=69) and transport incidents (5.9%, n=82). Extremities were the most common anatomical region of injury. The most common procedure was irrigation and debridement (78.7%, n=1096). Inpatient mortality was 1.9% (n=27). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of casualties from a low-resource conflict setting (LRCS) in Burkina Faso, we observed prolonged prehospital times, predominantly isolated soft tissue and extremity injuries, low inpatient mortality and gaps in data availability. Coordinated efforts to standardise casualty data collection in LRCS may hold the potential to improve insight into injury patterns and outcomes in similar environments as well as yield evidence-based opportunities to reduce preventable death.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Terror attacks & active shooter events · Low- and middle-income settings · Military & tactical · Mortality & survival · Time intervals
Related articles
- [Care of military and civilian casualties during the war in Croatia]. (Acta Med Croatica, 2006)
- Prolonged casualty care: Extrapolating civilian data to the military context. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2022)
- Comparison of severe trauma treatment standards in civilian China with current practice in the Chinese military peacekeeping Level 2 Military Hospital in Gao, Mali. (J R Army Med Corps, 2018)
- Prehospital trauma system in a low-income country: system maturation and adaptation during 8 years. (J Trauma, 2008)
- Trained lay first responders reduce trauma mortality: a controlled study of rural trauma in Iraq. (Prehosp Disaster Med, 2010)
- Assessing the evolution of pre-hospital combat casualty care: A comparative study of two conflicts a decade apart. (Am J Emerg Med, 2025)