It's time to talk to emergency medical dispatchers: survey study on performance feedback and patient outcome follow-up to EMDs.
BMC Emergency Medicine · 2025-08-27 · Observational study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Performance feedback and patient outcome follow-up are essential in emergency medical services. Prior literature has assessed the importance of feedback/follow-up on paramedics and emergency medical technicians, however there is a paucity of literature specific to emergency medical dispatchers (EMD). Our objective was to measure the frequency, satisfaction with, and importance of feedback/follow-up received by EMDs. METHODS: Anonymous electronic survey study of United States (US)-based (approximately 60,000) members of the International Academies of Emergency Dispatch (IAED). Definitions of performance feedback and outcome follow-up were provided. Survey questions regarding frequency of feedback, satisfaction with feedback, and importance of feedback were scored on a 4-point Likert scale and were summarized with frequency counts and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 256 responses were received from 13,723 members who opened the email invitation, although not all are US-based. Respondents were predominantly female (n = 163, 63.7%), white (n = 224, 87.5%) and had been a dispatcher for ≥ 10 years (n = 158, 61.7%). Nearly half (n = 119, 46.5%) indicated receiving no performance feedback in the prior 30 days and 77.7% (n = 199) indicated no patient outcome follow-up in the same time period. EMDs were dissatisfied more with the quantity (n = 189, 73.8%) and quality (n = 174, 68.0%) of follow-up, compared to the quantity (n = 102, 39.8%) and quality (n = 102, 39.8%) of feedback they receive. Respondents indicated receiving feedback was important in terms of overall job satisfaction (n = 222, 86.7%), ongoing medical education (n = 222, 86.7%), future patient care (n = 215, 84.0%), and mental health and wellbeing (n = 200, 78.1%). Follow-up was important in terms of overall job satisfaction (n = 208, 81.3%), mental health and wellbeing (n = 201, 78.5%), ongoing medical education (n = 193, 75.4%), and future patient care (n = 187, 73.0%). CONCLUSION: Survey respondents indicated a paucity of both performance feedback and outcome follow-up and that there is more dissatisfaction with lack of the latter rather than the former. These findings suggest system-wide opportunities to improve communication to EMDs on performance and patient outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Clinician perspective · Communication & handover · Dispatchers & call takers
Related articles
- Explaining the experience of telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Kermanshah emergency medical dispatch: A qualitative, phenomenological study. (BMC Emerg Med, 2025)
- Emergency Medical Services Streaming Enabled Evaluation In Trauma: The SEE-IT Feasibility RCT. (Health Soc Care Deliv Res, 2025)
- Identifying patients at imminent risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the Emergency Medical call: The views of call-takers. (Resusc Plus, 2023)
- From hearing to seeing: medical dispatchers' experience with use of video streaming in medical emergency calls - a qualitative study. (BMJ Open, 2022)
- Study of prehospital video telehealth for callers with mental health-related complaints. (Emerg Med J, 2023)
- Emergency medical dispatchers' experiences of managing emergency calls: a qualitative interview study. (BMJ Open, 2022)