Video vs. direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates: a meta-analysis.
Frontiers in Pediatrics · 2025-01-01 · Meta-analysis
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to synthesize data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness and safety of videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy in neonates undergoing endotracheal intubation. METHODS: This meta-analysis was conducted on June 1, 2024, in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL EbscoHost databases to identify relevant trials. Primary outcome was the success rate of intubation on the first attempt. Secondary outcomes included the time required for successful intubation, number of intubation attempts, adverse events related to both non-airway and airway complications. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to rule out the possibility of false positive result. RESULTS: Nine RCTs involving 1,059 neonates were included. Videolaryngoscopy significantly improved the success rate of first-attempt intubation [risk ratio (RR) 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.38], TSA confirmed these findings. Subgroup analyses indicated that videolaryngoscopy was particularly beneficial for inexperienced clinicians or when used in the neonatal intensive care unit. However, videolaryngoscopy did not significantly reduce the number of intubation attempts [mean difference (MD) -0.22, 95% CI -0.44-0.01] and had a similar time to successful intubation as direct laryngoscopy (MD 0.91, 95% CI -0.32-2.14). Videolaryngoscopy was associated with less airway trauma (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.89). Additionally, videolaryngoscopy showed minimal differences in the occurrence of bradycardia, desaturation, or low oxygen saturation levels during intubation. CONCLUSION: The current evidence suggested that videolaryngoscopy enhanced the success rate of first-attempt intubation and reduced airway trauma, while requiring a similar time required for successful intubation compared to direct laryngoscopy. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024552392, PROSPERO CRD42024552392.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Video laryngoscopy · Endotracheal intubation · Neonates
Related articles
- Video versus direct laryngoscopy for urgent tracheal intubation in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2025)
- Comparison of video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for urgent intubation in newborn infants: A meta-analysis. (Paediatr Respir Rev, 2025)
- Video laryngoscopy in neonate and infant intubation-a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Eur J Pediatr, 2024)
- Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates. (Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018)
- Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Urgent Intubation of Newborn Infants. (N Engl J Med, 2024)
- Video versus direct laryngoscopy to improve the success rate of nasotracheal intubations in the neonatal intensive care setting: a randomised controlled trial. (BMJ Paediatr Open, 2023)