Adjunct tirofiban after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a GRADE-guided meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis.
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis · 2025-12-29 · Meta-analysis
Abstract
Early platelet-mediated re-occlusion and microvascular "no-reflow" can blunt the benefits of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Tirofiban, a short-acting GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, may stabilize post-lysis reperfusion. Our analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of adjunct tirofiban after IVT versus IVT alone (alteplase or Tenecteplase) in patients with AIS. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified through searches of PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science up to August 2025. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs), and continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs), each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Three RCTs with 1,132 patients were included. Tirofiban improved excellent outcome (64.09% vs. 54.24%, RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.33, P = 0.002) and functional independence (80.67% vs. 70.45%, RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.38, P = 0.01) and reduced poor outcome (19.32% vs. 29.54%, RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.81, P = 0.0006). Early neurologic improvement favored tirofiban at 24-72 h (p = 0.001) but was neutral at 5-7 days (p = 0.25). Safety did not differ for any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (p = 0.26), asymptomatic ICH (p = 0.75), symptomatic ICH (p = 0.68), systemic bleeding (p = 0.75), or 90-day mortality (p = 0.84). Across randomized trials, adjunct tirofiban after IVT improved 90-day functional outcomes and early neurologic recovery. For safety, no statistically significant differences were observed in any ICH, asymptomatic ICH, systemic bleeding, or 90-day mortality; however, the estimate for sICH was very imprecise and does not exclude a clinically important increase. These results are exploratory and warrant confirmation in larger, multinational RCTs before informing practice.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Antithrombotics & thrombolytics · Thrombolytics · Mortality & survival · Quality of life & function · GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors
Related articles
- Efficacy and safety of adjuvant tirofiban versus intravenous thrombolysis alone in acute ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2026)
- Efficacy and safety of tirofiban combined with intravenous thrombolysis in Acute ischemic stroke: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. (Neurol Res, 2026)
- Intravenous Thrombolysis Plus Tirofiban in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (J Emerg Med, 2025)
- Efficacy and safety of tirofiban plus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator versus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator alone in acute ischemic stroke patients: a meta-analysis. (J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2025)
- Tirofiban for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (Cerebrovasc Dis, 2023)
- Early tirofiban administration for patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis or bridging therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. (Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2022)