Stroke Recognition Tools for Spanish-Speaking Consumers: A Nationwide Study.
Stroke · 2026-01-14 · Randomised trial
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stroke burden and structural inequities in stroke education among US Spanish-speaking Hispanic and Latino (SSHL) adults suggest a need for culturally appropriate education. Existing Spanish stroke recognition acronyms need to be evaluated among SSHL adults. METHODS: A 3-phase exploratory sequential design was used. To inform design of AHORA (Andar [Walk] or Alzar [Raise], Hablar [Talk], Ojos [Eyes], Rostro [Face], Ambos Brazos [Both Arms] or Activar [Activate]), PARA Stroke (Palabras [Words], Alzar [Raise], Rostro [Face], Avisar [Warn]), and RÁPIDO (Rostro Caído [Face Drooping], Alteración Del Equilibrio [Loss of Balance], Pérdida de Fuerza en el Brazo o Una Pierna [Loss of Strength in an Arm or Leg], Impedimento Visual [Visual Impairment], Dificultad PARA Stroke Hablar [Difficulty Speaking], Obtén Ayuda [Get Help]) before a randomized, parallel, 4-group prepost efficacy study involving 1105 SSHL participants (phase 3), interviews with health care professionals (n=15; phase 1) in May-June 2022 and focus groups with SSHL individuals (n=24; phase 2) were conducted in June-July 2022. Participants viewed a 1-minute video that included AHORA, PARA Stroke, RÁPIDO, or usual care (education without an acronym). Stroke knowledge and intent to contact 9-1-1 were examined pre- and 30 days post-video exposure via online questionnaires. Ordinal regression analyses were completed to determine acronym performances in improving stroke recognition, and binomial regression analyses were completed to determine increasing intention to call 9-1-1. Post hoc repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine if any acronym led to the greatest increase in intention to call 9-1-1. RESULTS: At 30 days post-video (n=367), odds of recognizing more stroke signs compared with usual care were given as follows: odds ratio, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.45-1.69; P=0.69), odds ratio, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.28-1.00; P=0.05), and odds ratio, 1.47 (95% CI, 0.73-2.99; P=0.28), and odds of increased intent to call 9-1-1 were given as follows: 1.18 (95% CI, 0.59-2.37; P=0.64), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.49-1.80; P=0.76), and 1.06 (95% CI, 0.54-2.06; P=0.84) for AHORA, PARA Stroke, and RÁPIDO, respectively. The acronyms had significant long-term positive effects on the intent to call 9-1-1 (F[1101]=251.457; P<0.001; MSE=41.321) although no significant differences were observed between the acronyms. CONCLUSIONS: AHORA, PARA Stroke, and RÁPIDO performed comparably to usual care. Healthcare professionals and SSHL consumers preferred a Spanish-language acronym, specifically RÁPIDO and PARA Stroke, compared with an acronym translated verbatim from English to Spanish.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Bystanders · Communication & handover · Equity & disparities
Related articles
- Efficacy of five strategies to improve stroke action awareness in Spanish-speaking adults: A randomized comparison. (Int J Stroke, 2026)
- Cluster-randomised controlled trial of Stroke 1-2-0 education programme to reduce stroke prehospital delay in China: a study protocol. (BMJ Open, 2021)
- AHORA: a Spanish language tool to identify acute stroke symptoms. (Stroke Vasc Neurol, 2022)
- Impact of Patient Language on Emergency Medical Service Use and Prenotification for Acute Ischemic Stroke. (Neurohospitalist, 2019)
- Methodology for a community-based stroke preparedness intervention: the Acute Stroke Program of Interventions Addressing Racial and Ethnic Disparities Study. (Stroke, 2014)
- Knowledge of Acute Coronary Syndrome Symptoms and the Intention to Call Emergency Medical Services in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Australians. (Heart Lung Circ, 2024)