Missing Data in OHCA Registries: How Multiple Imputation Methods Affect Research Conclusions-Paper II.
Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2026-01-16 · Method & validation
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Missing data in clinical observational studies, such as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) registries, can compromise statistical validity. Single imputation methods are simple alternatives to complete-case analysis (CCA) but do not account for imputation uncertainty. Multiple imputation (MI) is the standard for handling missing-at-random (MAR) data, yet its implementation remains challenging. This study evaluated the performance of MI in association analysis compared with CCA and single imputation methods. Methods: Using a simulation framework with real-world Singapore OHCA registry data (N = 13,274 complete cases), we artificially introduced 20%, 30%, and 40% missingness under MAR. MI was implemented using predictive mean matching (PMM), random forest (RF), and classification and regression trees (CART) algorithms, with 5-20 imputations. Performance was assessed based on bias and precision in a logistic regression model evaluating the association between alert issuance and bystander CPR. Results: CART outperformed PMM, providing more accurate β coefficients and stable CIs across missingness levels. Although K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) produced similar point estimates, it underestimated imputation uncertainty. PMM showed larger bias, wider and less stable CIs, and in some settings performed similarly to CCA. MI methods produced wider CIs than single imputation, appropriately capturing imputation uncertainty. Increasing the number of imputations had minimal impact on point estimates but modestly narrowed CIs. Conclusions: MI performance depends strongly on the chosen algorithm. CART and RF methods offered the most robust and consistent results for OHCA data, whereas PMM may not be optimal and should be selected with caution. MI using tree-based methods (CART/RF) remains the preferred strategy for generating reliable conclusions in OHCA research.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Research methods & trial conduct
Related articles
- Missing Data in OHCA Registries: How Imputation Methods Affect Research Conclusions-Paper I. (J Clin Med, 2025)
- Evaluating the use of existing data sources, probabilistic linkage, and multiple imputation to build population-based injury databases across phases of trauma care. (Acad Emerg Med, 2012)
- The validity of using multiple imputation for missing out-of-hospital data in a state trauma registry. (Acad Emerg Med, 2006)
- A link to improve stroke patient care: a successful linkage between a statewide emergency medical services data system and a stroke registry. (Acad Emerg Med, 2010)
- Probabilistic Linkage of Prehospital and Outcomes Data in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2015)
- Towards advancing Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) registries globally: Considerations from the global OHCA registry (GOHCAR) collaborative. (Resusc Plus, 2024)