Pain management of adults in the prehospital setting: a scoping review.
BMC Emergency Medicine · 2026-02-17 · Scoping review
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The most effective treatment for pain in prehospital adults remains uncertain. This scoping review aimed to descriptively synthesize the evidence and identify research gaps regarding pain interventions for adults in prehospital settings. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and TRIP on 11 April 2025. Systematic reviews of adults receiving a pain intervention in the prehospital setting were included. We defined prehospital pain in this review as adults (18 years or >) treated for pain by a healthcare professional in the out-of-hospital setting from the time of first contact at the scene until emergency department admission. AMSTAR 2 was used to assess quality. RESULTS: There were 22 systematic reviews (n = 193 primary studies, n = 93,092 adults) included that assessed 24 interventions including fentanyl (n = 9 reviews, 41%), ketamine (n = 9, 41%), morphine (n = 7, 32%), ketamine plus morphine (n = 7, 32%), fascia iliaca nerve block (n = 5, 23%), methoxyflurane (n = 5, 23%), nitrous oxide (n = 5, 23%), sufentanil (n = 4, 18%), tramadol (n = 4, 18%), paracetamol (n = 3, 14%), alfentanil (n = 2, 9%), femoral nerve block (n = 2, 9%), ibuprofen (n = 2, 9%), pentazocine (n = 2, 9%), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (n = 2, 9%), auricular acupressure (n = 1, 5%), butorphanol (n = 1, 5%), hydromorphone (n = 1, 5%), ketamine plus nitrous oxide (n = 1, 5%), meperidine (n = 1, 5%), metamizole (n = 1, 5%), papaveretum (n = 1, 5%), and traction/splinting (n = 1, 5%). A third (38%; n = 8) of reviews conducted meta-analyses; median = 876 participants (IQR: 320–1538). However, no meta-analyses met the threshold of 5126 participants deemed necessary following trial sequence analysis. The quality of reviews was high (n = 8, 36%), moderate (n = 9, 41%), low (n = 2, 9%), and critically low (n = 3, 14%). CONCLUSIONS: Larger pragmatic trials using a single validated pain scale with interventions administered at standardized time intervals are required to facilitate evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision-making for pain management in prehospital settings. STUDY PROTOCOL PRE-REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MH7Q9 .
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Alfentanil · Anaesthetics · Analgesics · Fentanyl · Ibuprofen · Ketamine · Methoxyflurane · Morphine · Nitrous oxide · NSAIDs · Paracetamol · Nerve block · Splinting & reduction
Related articles
- Variability of Prehospital Pain Management Protocols: A Review of Prehospital Care Protocols in the United States. (Open Access Emerg Med, 2024)
- Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Pain Management: Recommendations. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2023)
- Application of analgesics in emergency services in Germany: a survey of the medical directors. (BMC Emerg Med, 2023)
- [Guideline 'Pain management for trauma patients in the chain of emergency care']. (Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 2011)
- Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Trauma Patients in an Out-of-Hospital Emergency Setting: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2018)
- Prehospital Analgesia for Pediatric Trauma Patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2018)